Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: Ray76
How do you magically transform “So of all of the Old Man’s kids, Mark’s claim is the only one that is uncontested” into “Obama’s claim is uncontested”?

Those aren't words you quoted initially. So appealing to words you didn't quote to try to salvage the misleading nature of your partial original quote illustrates my point.

Your original words:

Obama wrote, “Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark’s father was.” Then what’s that thing on the White House website?

Saying "Obama wrote" without noting he was quoting Auma makes it look like "Unlike my Mum" are Obama's words about his mother when they are not.

Making reference to the WH posting implies that there's some contradiction between that document and "Unlike my Mum, Ruth has all the documents need to prove who Mark's father was" when they refer to documentation for two different persons. The "documents" in the quote refers to documents to which would support Auma's claim of BHO's paternity. The WH posting proves the paternity of BHO Sr. to Obama Jr. Different things.

54 posted on 07/24/2015 10:28:30 AM PDT by CpnHook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: CpnHook

I quote what Obama wrote.

You claim what Obama wrote is false.


55 posted on 07/24/2015 10:34:34 AM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson