Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rick Santorum: Ted Cruz Is Losing Because He’s Not 'A Huckabee Or Santorum'
The Huffington Post's Huffpost Queer Voices ^ | March 4, 2016 | Michelangelo Signorile, Editor-at-Large, HuffPost Queer Voices

Posted on 03/05/2016 11:23:51 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: marron

Hahahaha!


21 posted on 03/05/2016 12:01:23 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (TED CRUZ 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Oh - I get it.

Ted Cruz is losing because he is not a Huckabee or Santorum.

If he was a Huckabee or Santorum then Ted Cruz would be losing miserably.

There is a difference between losing and losing miserably.


22 posted on 03/05/2016 12:06:16 PM PST by sipow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yes, he is doing so bad that he is STILL in the race, unlike those two. I like Rick, but Mike has really been annoying for some time now.


23 posted on 03/05/2016 12:13:47 PM PST by ladyellen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

And they won?

I am proud to have voted for Cruz today. I saw Santorum at my caucus location. I’m glad I did not stay to listen to him.


24 posted on 03/05/2016 12:26:43 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That’s ridiculous. Cruz is much more conservative than either Huck or Santo, both of whom are much more likely to involve the Federal Government in social concerns. Both are “compassionate conservative” types who will cave in to the dems/media onslaught trying to justify more federal spending on wealth transfer programs.


25 posted on 03/05/2016 12:30:27 PM PST by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ted Cruz is losing because Donald Trump decided to run. Cruz would have crushed the rest of the pack with ease and soundly defeated Hillary or Bernie or Whoever.

This isn’t Rocket Science. I know. I studied Rocket Science. You open a bottle of Coke, take swig, put your thumb over the opening, shake it like crazy and then remove your thumb and point the bottle at your buddies. Lots of fun and you get to earn How Rockets Work.


26 posted on 03/05/2016 12:44:56 PM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622
Didn’t they lose?

Yes, to Mitt Romney who carried Texas in the Republican primary with 69% of the vote.

27 posted on 03/05/2016 12:48:17 PM PST by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Ted left the ground open for Trump to step in and occupy on the issue that is propelling Trump.
If he had been as forceful about illegal aliens when he announced as he is now, it may have been different.
Cruz could bring himself to use words like deportation and enforcement before Trump did.


28 posted on 03/05/2016 12:56:22 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Of course Santorum would be doing so much better against the celebrity candidate.

Good point!

I supported Santorum in 2012, and he did well in the primaries (especially in Iowa, where he was truly robbed of his victory).

But Santorum didn't have to run against a celebrity juggernaut.

He speaks of Cruz's alleged weakness in the south ... I wonder if some evangelicals in South Carolina, who voted for Trump, are starting to have buyer's remorse?

Especially now that Trump appears to think he has the nomination sewn up. Trump doesn't seem to think he needs us conservatives anymore ... he is now lurching to the left.

29 posted on 03/05/2016 12:59:25 PM PST by shhrubbery! (NIH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Has anybody here seen my old friends Rick and Huck?
Can you see them in the mist?
I thought I saw them walking over the hill
With Lindsay, and Martin, and Chris.

This needs to be set to a melody! I think I’ve got something here!


30 posted on 03/05/2016 1:13:54 PM PST by alstewartfan (CRUZ OR LOSE, AMERICA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What does Santorum do when he’s not running for president? Will he be the modern Harold Stassen?


31 posted on 03/05/2016 1:15:24 PM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That’s cute, Little Ricky.

But try as I might, I do not recall your stint in the Oval Office.


32 posted on 03/05/2016 1:17:04 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
Ted left the ground open for Trump to step in and occupy on the issue that is propelling Trump. If he had been as forceful about illegal aliens when he announced as he is now, it may have been different. Cruz could bring himself to use words like deportation and enforcement before Trump did.

I really wish it were that simple. Then we could have a war of ideas and principle and knowledge. Unfortunately we are having a war that is primarily about personalities and likeability with an emphasis on macho.

Trump has built his campaign around protecting and growing jobs for Americans. A worthy cause no doubt. But the border war with Mexico is not about jobs. It is about demographics and the Democrats successful and longstanding (remember Lyndon Johnson) plan to grow the black and hispanic voting population to a point where they can gain and retain absolute control of the Federal Government. That plan is working.

Cruz is fighting the demographic fight. That is a hard sell. Trump is fighting the jobs fight - an easier fight to fight. In the long run the Cruz fight is the more important one. In the short run Trump will most likely win the Presidency by defending the American Worker - once again, a noble cause.

33 posted on 03/05/2016 1:38:04 PM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: builder
Isn't Cruz doing way better than Huckabee or Santorum ever did?!?

He is. He's able to combine Evangelical social conservatism with "constitutional conservatism." That gives him broader appeal than Huckabee or Santorum.

It's probably not enough to win -- in fact it may be a recipe for not winning -- but it still puts him out in front of one-note wonders like Huck and Rick.

I always wonder what is wrong with people's thought processes.

Understand that ego comes first and people don't like to admit things about themselves that injures their vanity and you'll have made a good start.

34 posted on 03/05/2016 1:47:31 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Good grief; Ted is smarter than both of them put together.


35 posted on 03/05/2016 2:10:37 PM PST by CyberAnt ("Peace Through Strength")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Was that meant as praise or criticism? Hard to tell these days.


36 posted on 03/05/2016 2:11:44 PM PST by taxcontrol ( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip
"Because there is no way Texans knowingly elect a Canadian to represent them in Washington>

Kazaaam! Another slam on the fine folks of Texas being easily decieved. I mean after all, Ted Cruz was the longest-serving Soliciter General in the history of Texas. . . . Naw . . . dat dont mean nuthin.

Now that we have established Cruz is not an American, does that invalidate his conservative values? Aside from Cruz being an incredidble liar and deciever (boring) you really do not believe Mr. Trump can win on his own merits?

One is not a true conservative unless you are willing to eat your own!

37 posted on 03/05/2016 2:26:17 PM PST by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain
Now that we have established Cruz is not an American, does that invalidate his conservative values?

Your conservative values may say it was okay not to tell voters in Texas that he was a Canadian citizen because he knew he would not be elected if he told the truth. That is not what my conservative values tell me.
38 posted on 03/05/2016 2:37:00 PM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - He's creepy and he's kooky, mysterious and spooky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip
Actually I was not talking about "your" conservative values. We already established your conservative creds with your view of Texans and willingness to eat your own.

I was curious if a non-American individual such as Cruz can hold and espouse conservative values. Apparently not.

39 posted on 03/05/2016 2:56:24 PM PST by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain
Actually I was not talking about "your" conservative values. We already established your conservative creds

That's rich coming from someone who thinks it's okay to flat out lie to voters to get elected. Especially on something as important as one's citizenship. No thanks, I don't need someone of you morally casual conservative values judging me on my values.
40 posted on 03/05/2016 3:02:48 PM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - He's creepy and he's kooky, mysterious and spooky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson