Skip to comments.
Scapegoat Utility Vehicle=SUVs are much safer than those puny cars.
Wall St Journal ^
| October 13, 2003
Posted on 10/13/2003 6:02:06 AM PDT by SJackson
Edited on 04/22/2004 11:50:06 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration chief Jeffrey Runge rarely misses an opportunity to warn Americans about the "rollover" risk of SUVs. Perhaps he might also find a moment to point out his own agency's findings that overall highway safety -- even with millions more SUVs on the road -- is improving.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: suv
1
posted on
10/13/2003 6:02:07 AM PDT
by
SJackson
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: All
Your Donation Helps Counter These Guys
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3
posted on
10/13/2003 6:05:45 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: SJackson
4
posted on
10/13/2003 6:28:52 AM PDT
by
backhoe
(Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the Sunset...)
To: SJackson
Big 'ole SUV bump!
5
posted on
10/13/2003 6:37:47 AM PDT
by
Ditter
To: msdrby; 300winmag; RosieCotton; Wneighbor; ecurbh; Corin Stormhands
I love my SUV ping
6
posted on
10/13/2003 7:08:14 AM PDT
by
Prof Engineer
(Always use the word Impossible with the greatest caution ~ Werner Von Braun___ 5/14/04 Baby Moot '04)
To: Support Free Republic
I continue to drive a "scapegoat" SUV. I love it......
7
posted on
10/13/2003 7:15:24 AM PDT
by
showme_the_Glory
(No more rhyming, and I mean it! ..Anybody got a peanut.....)
To: SJackson
I'm bookmarking this article for future reference. Time to que the song "In a Yugo".
My first SUV was a 1956 Jeep 4WD Station Wagon in 1965 followed by many others. My current ride is a 99 Silverado 4X4 Club Coupe (Extended Cab).
8
posted on
10/13/2003 7:24:49 AM PDT
by
tubebender
(FReeRepublic...How bad have you got it...)
To: SJackson
Our second vehicle is a 6000 pound Roadtrek camper van with bathroom, frig, sink, tv, and other amenities. Nice for those who hate public restrooms!
9
posted on
10/13/2003 7:25:59 AM PDT
by
IpaqMan
To: SJackson
I don't happen to be a SUV fan myself, but I wouldn't consider forcing people to adopt my preferences.
10
posted on
10/13/2003 7:42:18 AM PDT
by
No.6
To: showme_the_Glory
I'd prefer to just have a bigger station wagon rather than a top-heavy SUV, but because of CAFE I don't get a choice.
11
posted on
10/13/2003 7:58:16 AM PDT
by
gura
To: gura
I'd prefer to have a medium size SUV (or AWD crossover wagon) that gets the same tax treatment (up to $100,000 immediately expensed as business expense) as the large SUVs do.
To: SJackson
Never mind a wimpy little SUV. I want a Bugatti Royale.
13
posted on
10/13/2003 9:19:29 AM PDT
by
Salman
(Mickey Akbar)
To: SJackson
From a separate Nat'l Academy of Sciences report:
Between '76 and '93, the difference in weight between the average light truck and the average passenger car increased by almost 500 lbs.
In '76, the avg car was 3522 lbs, and the avg light trk 3770 lbs.
By '93, the car had dropped 705 lbs, to 2816 lbs, while the truck had dropped only 309 lbs, to 3461.
NHTSA has estimated the annual increase in highway deaths due to the weight reduction in cars and trucks at about 1500 per year.
1500 dead so that the Greens can be happy!
Might may not always make right, but weight sure does!
14
posted on
10/13/2003 10:11:52 AM PDT
by
Redbob
To: SJackson
The biggest SUVs, weighing 5,000-plus pounds, were the safest of all with a rate of 92. Politically correct mini-cars, meanwhile, were the most dangerous with a rate of 249 deaths per million vehicles And this isn't even a PASSENGER MILES comparison.
A small can can only carry 4 people, so the maximum number of people that could be killed in a collision would be 4 (except in southern states, of course)
A large SUV could have 8 or 9 people, doulbling the amount of people that could possibly be killed per accident.
If Large SUV fatality rates were figured on passenger miles instead of the total number of vehicles, the rate could be 1/2 of the 40% shown above vs. small cars.
15
posted on
10/13/2003 10:28:30 AM PDT
by
UNGN
(I've been here since '98 but had nothing to say until now)
To: SJackson
They may be safer in a vacuum, but the dipshits who drive 'em in Houston are congenitally incapable of confining their vehicles to ONE LANE, DAMMIT.
16
posted on
10/13/2003 10:29:11 AM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
To: biblewonk
17
posted on
10/13/2003 10:37:25 AM PDT
by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary. You have the right to be wrong.)
To: SJackson
To: SJackson
My older daughter caused an accident by entering a roadway and being hit by a pickup. She was driving the 87 Chrysler New Yorker I had bought her. The car was completely spun around during the accident and was totalled. She received minor scratches from a broken side window. If she had been driving her present Honda Civic, she would probably have been killed.
My youngest daughter was following too closely while driving my 87 Jeep Cherokee. The front fenders were crumpled but she was unhurt.
In both cases, my daughters were driving the larger vehicles by my choice. Now they are older, wiser, and responsible for their own choices.
To: tubebender
I love my Silverado. I'm fortunate to own an 02 Silverado 2500HD, 4x4, Extended Cab, Duramax Turbo Diesel, Allison 5 speed, Eaton rear diff. locker. What a ride!
20
posted on
10/13/2003 2:15:33 PM PDT
by
Octar
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson