Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fascinating Phenomena: Can an actor govern California? (1967 Editorial about Reagan)
Wall Street Journal/Opinion Journal ^ | October 13, 2003 (originally October 3, 1967) | Vermont Royster

Posted on 10/13/2003 11:55:48 PM PDT by Tamzee

Edited on 04/23/2004 12:06:00 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

SAN FRANCISCO--An eastern visitor to these western slopes is primed beforehand on the questions he'll face when he gets home. He'll be expected to return as an expert on topless waitresses, the hippies of Hashbury and Ronald Reagan.

On the first question, suffice it to say after diligent research that there's quite a discrepancy between the idealized female form and its fleshy embodiment. As for the hippies, they somehow bring to mind those dropouts of another day, the mendicant monks of the Middle Ages, and strike you as more to be pitied than scorned.


(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; catrans; reagan
Wonderful :-)
1 posted on 10/13/2003 11:55:48 PM PDT by Tamzee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
DANG FREEPERS KEPT ME FROM BECOMING THE WORLD'S GREEN KING!


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

2 posted on 10/13/2003 11:57:05 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
Great article! Thanks for posting it.

So with his arguments about the monstrosities of the state's medical welfare program. The governor makes perfectly clear he's no callous man, saying over and over again that there's no question of the state's responsibility to the unfortunate and that he will not "retreat from that responsibility."

But why, he asks, should those who earn their own way, and pay their own doctors, provide medical care for their fellow citizens "more comprehensive than they can afford for themselves"? Answering that is a little sticky too.

This is as relevant a question today as it was forty years ago.

3 posted on 10/14/2003 2:53:17 AM PDT by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
This post has been added to the… California In Transition- Must read Threads!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin

4 posted on 10/14/2003 7:45:26 AM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
On the first question,[regarding topless waitresses] suffice it to say after diligent research that there's quite a discrepancy between the idealized female form and its fleshy embodiment.

LOL. This comment would never fly today.

5 posted on 10/14/2003 7:52:11 AM PDT by Grit (Tolerance for all but the intolerant...and those who tolerate intolerance etc etc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey


Click to subscribe to CA4Bush2004 –
A Yahoo Group for California Supporters of
President Bush and Vice President Cheney

6 posted on 10/15/2003 10:13:37 AM PDT by My2Cents (Well...there you go again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson