To: Sandylapper
I'm not sure your right Sandy. LE had a Court qualified warrant on Scott's phoneS. Therefore when he phoned and said those things to her that IS admissable evidence. The reason for the wiretaps was to collect evidence. LE also had Amber's phone tapped. Remember the reference that she supposedly sent him a book with a note somewhere near the back of it saying "my phone is tapped don't call me"? I recall a Lawyer on probably LKL since I don't get FOX, say that that could have been a way for her to validate her own phone taping. How? Because then the other party had been advised. I'm sure that is the law in CA that you can only tape conversations if both parties know.
58 posted on
10/14/2003 4:05:43 PM PDT by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South)
To: Canadian Outrage
I may not be right, CO! It's just that my dang gut is acting up again! LOL! Think you once told me to heave it up and spit it out, but I can't. It's really sticking in my craw and won't go away. Makes me angry, too. I hate humble pie, and may have to eat a big helping! ROFL
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson