Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sandylapper
I'm not sure your right Sandy. LE had a Court qualified warrant on Scott's phoneS. Therefore when he phoned and said those things to her that IS admissable evidence. The reason for the wiretaps was to collect evidence. LE also had Amber's phone tapped. Remember the reference that she supposedly sent him a book with a note somewhere near the back of it saying "my phone is tapped don't call me"? I recall a Lawyer on probably LKL since I don't get FOX, say that that could have been a way for her to validate her own phone taping. How? Because then the other party had been advised. I'm sure that is the law in CA that you can only tape conversations if both parties know.
58 posted on 10/14/2003 4:05:43 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Canadian Outrage
I may not be right, CO! It's just that my dang gut is acting up again! LOL! Think you once told me to heave it up and spit it out, but I can't. It's really sticking in my craw and won't go away. Makes me angry, too. I hate humble pie, and may have to eat a big helping! ROFL
60 posted on 10/14/2003 4:19:22 PM PDT by Sandylapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson