Replies

You had already posted to this thread, of course, but I keep recalling Soros and his statement about in so many years, we will have leaders in this many of the medical schools in this country.

I hate to sound like I need tinfoil, but have they not, perhaps, invaded the medical profession to some degree with their death culture?

Soros was clearly stating his intention to place people in medical schools in order to indoctrinate the students. IMO.

Then we see Singer teaching ethics and philosophy to the "cream of the crop" and possibly the next generation of leadership in this country.

And then I read this study that Soros and his death culture funded. It was about using hospice for chronically and terminally ill children and it was very frightening, if you read between the lines, to me.
Placing the kids in hospices instead of hospitals when they had a sickle cell crisis, for example. And I kept thinking, now why would you do that? A hospice is certainly not set up for critical care - no lab or xray to call for those middle of the night stats, and do they even code people in a hospice?

I just couldn't help thinking it was all about giving them a nice place to die instead of assisting them in staying alive. Of course the wording was heavily focused on issues like the more comforting environment of the hospice as opposed to the hospital.

Have you ever looked into the projects Soros and his Project Death in America fund?

Soros' project for a good death is a stealth euthanasia group that includes people on both sides of the argument (i.e. so that he can fund the pro death people).

I fought euthanasia for years with letters to the editors, but finally the agendas of Soros and the New England Journal are now opposed by bigshots, and the farce about euthanasia in the Netherlands has been finally exposed in the literature...(so I no longer have to write protesting letters, since professors now write them)

however, the culture of death is alive and well in academia and in major medical schools.