DATE RAPE! DID YOU SEE WHAT I SAW?

CookingWithCarlo.com ^ | Oct 16 2003 | Carlo3b Dad, Chef, Author

[Howlin]

Colorado law demands that permission be granted by the judge before the claims are made public.

30 days before a jury trial; the law doesn't mention or apply to preliminary hearings -- the prosecutor himself acknowledged that in his press conference yesterday.

[carlo3b]

LOLOLOL.. picky, picky.. :)

[Budge]

... “Gossip, (and slander) is like mud thrown against a clean wall; it may not stick, but it leaves a mark.”“Gossip, (and slander) is like mud thrown against a clean wall; it may not stick, but it leaves a mark.”

Which is exactly how marxist/communist gain supporters.

"Tell a lie long enough and it will become truth."

Gee, now who may have said that?

By golly, it was not said by a someone in the U.S.S.R.!

Sorry Carlo, I'm not picking on you, but the idiots who follow the democRAT party line and never realize what that party now stands for!

[TexasTransplant]

In the interest of "sexual equality," I've come up with an option. Maybe men should be given equal time by allowing them to bring charges against female sexual partners for "being a bad lay."

Purge, Purge, Purge all visuals... must get it out of my head, Purge, Purge (dang-it I ain't that old, I remember when this stuff was for Fun) Purge, Purge all visuals. Just Dam, now I got to hire a stinkin lawyer just to go to sleep at night! Now on the Flip side - IF she was ARMED and she was RAPED would we discussing this at all?

[carlo3b]

""Tell a lie long enough and it will become truth."" By golly, it was not said by a someone in the U.S.S.R.!

Yes indeed I agree my dear FRiend, it was said by Adolph Hitler! It has been adopted as the motto of the Demorats... LOLOL

[laredo44]

There are no facts, only interpretations."

He's a lot more right than you think.

Interpretation of what?

[aruanan]

Interpretation of what?

Interpretation of one's experience.

[mamaduck]

"Homeschool Mom Syndrome" :-)

[Syncro]

freedox, yer a nut! LOL

It seems sometimes if a woman looks back and realizes she was just used for sex, she can claim rape.

What if a man is used for sex by a woman, does he have the same right?

Not that a man would mind under normal circumstances...

But if he was seduced and lied to...but women don't do that, just men?

:>)

Thanks for leveling the playing field.

[autoresponder]

OldFriend is 100% correct.

Defense attorney was required by law to bring this up with the hearing judge in private chambers before her media orgasm.

Here we have a wimpy judge and an El Cheapo 5&10 prosecutor and a multi-millionaire lib woman defense attorney.

Six (6) count 'em Six (6) times this "b" atty broke Colorado rape shield trial statutes and procedures and the judge did zero!

This wimpy flexible lib judge should be empeached &/or removed &/or ????????

If you think it's OK to break established laws do not gripe when I sell the description, license plate #, and location of your new BMW to some "oppressed" gangbanger in your area.

It's "only fair"!

If I was related to this woman or a friend, Kobe Bryant would now be hiding in the back mountains of Castro's Cuba shaking and crying.




Guaranteed!





(Ask my daughter!)

[OldFriend]

It's clear that this Judge does not want to harm the celebrity climate that exists in that resort town.

The victim is expendable in the grand scheme of welcome to the 'in' crowd.

Last year a skier was seen recklessly speeding down the slope. He crashed into a fellow skier, killing the man. Colorado decided the visitor from Britain was not liable for his reckless behaviour and no charges were filed.

Ski resorts have only one value.....the bottom line and justice be damned.

[cajun-jack]

of course they don't....carville just tells her they did and it is bush's fault she didn't enjoy it.

[carlo3b]

It's "only fair"! ..
If I was related to this woman or a friend, Kobe Bryant would now be hiding in the back mountains of Castro's Cuba shaking and crying. ...
Guaranteed!

I am so sorry for your daughter, whatever horrible thing happened to her.. but just "TO BE FAIR", what if you are the mother of a boy that had some gutter slut accuse him of rape because he didn't ring her bell in bed! I know what was he doing in... BLAH, BLAH

Give me a break, you and dangerous jerks like you, are the reason that stupid unfair laws like this travesty exists.. what do you personally know about this case that we, and apparently the JUDGE doesn't know..

The defense had every right under existing Colorado law, to bring into court (that was open to the public because the prosecutor demanded it) any relevant evidence that impeaches or impacts the accusations against this defendant. Her dalliances with one or several men within the time frame of the incident has grave consequences on the validity of the alleged injuries..

SAVE YOUR DAUGHTER'S FURTHER EMBARRASSMENT by not sharing whatever sick episode she endured, just  to make your unworthy point, she has you as a parent, and for that she is a truely a real victim already!
 

[gitmo]

No, Nietzsche was wrong. There ARE facts. Often we don't know what they are, but the facts exist nonetheless. If facts don't exist, then nothing exists.

[fqued]

How about "there are no uninterpreted facts" [outside the Mind of God], which acknowledges the existence of facts, but also acknowledges that our perception of facts is filtered through finite minds.

[ladyjane]

While we're talking about 'being fair' and 'leveling the playing field' - I want to know the color of the panties the priests were wearing when they seduced the altar boys. And did the altar boys wear thongs? What about the blue cassocks? We have thousands of posts about this woman's anatomical parts, her public hair, and semen in her underwear yet no details about alleged attacks on men or boys. Many ask what a concierge is doing in a hotel room. How many ask what an altar boy is doing in the rectory. hmmm...I wonder why?

[fqued]

(A) Even if the girl had intercourse with one hundred men in the previous one hundred hours it would not negate her right to refuse intercourse with ANYONE.

(B) But it would certainly cause me to doubt her claim that any vaginal swelling,bruising or redness was caused by the one fellow she refused.

PRECISELY the issue. The defense is trying to say that the injuries supposed caused by the [alleged] rape are consistent with injuries caused by having sex with three different men in three days. The error here is that the prosecution brought forth those injuries as evidence of rape. The defense should have a right to refute that evidence by showing it as a possible result of other actions rather than the [alleged] rape

[fqued]

Six (6) count 'em Six (6) times this "b" atty broke Colorado rape shield trial statutes and procedures and the judge did zero!

Let us assume that the Defense Attorney did it deliberately and her "oops" appearance was a total sham. Do you know WHY she could get away with it?
They were using the initials of the supposed victim, but those initials are very similar to the name, and having used the name countless times in the last month, it is quite foreseeable that a person would slip from the initials to the name.
error here belongs to the dummies who decided to use the initials rather than "Jane Doe."

[fqued]

No, Nietzsche was wrong. There ARE facts. Often we don't know what they are, but the facts exist nonetheless. If facts don't exist, then nothing exists.

see my post #75

[gitmo]

How about "there are no uninterpreted facts" [outside the Mind of God], which acknowledges the existence of facts, but also acknowledges that our perception of facts is filtered through finite minds.

I'll buy that. But that's now what Nietzsche said. Plus, he thought God was dead. He's probably changed his mind about that by now, though.