Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mama_Bear
Hi Lori. Back again. Interesting thing about some of the plantations. We toured several a few years ago. One in particular is privately owned and refuses federal funds because by accepting fed funds requires them to remove certain "remnants" of slavery that occured on the property such as "slave schools". The private association felt that it was important that this part of history be preserved. (apparantly the fed thinking is that schooling slaves shows some positives by slave owners and we can't have that. Sounds pretty PC to me!)
112 posted on 10/17/2003 12:23:32 PM PDT by dutchess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: dutchess
(apparantly the fed thinking is that schooling slaves shows some positives by slave owners and we can't have that. Sounds pretty PC to me!)

The history revisionists strike again. Good, bad or ugly...truth is truth and fact is fact. Unfortunately, 'they' will continue to distort the facts to reflect what could have been, should have been or would have been, rather than what "was". Sad.

116 posted on 10/17/2003 12:38:28 PM PDT by Mama_Bear ( Lori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson