In the friendsofterri site they talk about battery and that a review of her records showed that she didn't have a heart attack. These are serious charges. What they don't mention however, is that is the indisputable fact that Terri was bulemic and the near certainty that she was potassium deficient.
My question is, based on the other testimony of her cognitive abilities, her life is obviously worth saving, why do people see the need to embellish her case with speculative information? Isn't that going to ultimately hurt her case if it's found to be untrue? And most importantly, won't that hurt the cause of all people with brain injuries, implying that if it's their fault that makes it ok to kill them?
Because if there are crimes and this guy "skates" it is perhaps ont of the ultimate mockeries of justice. This really desreves a FAIR invesitgation and not one by people who are on the hospice's board of directors!!!!