Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peterson's Mistress Seeks To Stop Sale Of Nude Photos
NBC4.com ^ | Oct 21, 2003

Posted on 10/22/2003 5:26:32 AM PDT by runningbear

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 901-908 next last
To: runningbear
.....30-year-old Modesto fertilizer salesman....

I snicker everytime I hear that.
61 posted on 10/22/2003 6:55:02 AM PDT by showme_the_Glory (No more rhyming, and I mean it! ..Anybody got a peanut.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
...so the clever Geragos smuggled two eyebrow wigs into the jail...
62 posted on 10/22/2003 6:55:23 AM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Sunshine55
...but she had better taste in men...
63 posted on 10/22/2003 6:56:33 AM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
I never open them. Do not reply to them either, reply confirms a human at the address.
64 posted on 10/22/2003 6:56:35 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Taglines are for the curious to read and the talented to write. Would someone write me one?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
ping for latter.
65 posted on 10/22/2003 6:58:19 AM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrisssssssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggiefluffs
IMO, they wanted girls with braces to give it that faux kiddie-porn look.

A long time ago, when the dentist suggested my son see an orthodontist, I went online to see what I could find about the state of orthodontics today, techniques for straightening teeth, newer styles of braces, etc.

Would you believe that I found more "pics of cute kids with braces" sites than orthodontics ads?? There are some real scum-suckers out there.
66 posted on 10/22/2003 7:00:05 AM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Flurry; Spunky
I know! I was kidding. Besides, the headers alone are enough to provide plenty of laughs.

I just wish they wouldn't involve innocent farm animals in all this.
67 posted on 10/22/2003 7:04:18 AM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
One should keep his mistress' picture in an appropriate, discreet locket...not post it here thank you.
68 posted on 10/22/2003 7:05:01 AM PDT by wtc911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
The cute little sheep need their privacy.
69 posted on 10/22/2003 7:09:36 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Taglines are for the curious to read and the talented to write. Would someone write me one?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Peterson's defense contends that because the cadaver dog, Twist, did not "alert" -- or indicate that she had found the sought-after scent -- in the boat, "the prosecution's own investigation proved that Laci Peterson's body was never in Scott Peterson's boat."

Actually it "proves" no such thing. To actually prove that Laci's body was never in the boat would be an extremely difficult thing to do.

All this indicates is that the reaction of the dog does not unequivocally support the hypothesis that her body was in the boat. It is consistent with the defence hypothesis that she was not in the boat, but does not prove it. There is a huge difference between an absence of support for a particular line of thinking and definitively showing that the line of thinking is mistaken. As the defense team itself knows and would strenuously argue, an "absence" of a particular person from his or her home, does not "prove" that he or she is dead.

More specious logic from the defense team as they play fast and loose with the English language.

70 posted on 10/22/2003 7:10:59 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lafroste
Well, it probably has something to do with morals and ethics. You probably have them, they don't.

BTW...dah....news flash to those that do this.....if you don't want nude photos of yourself floating around for all to see, don't pose nude!!!!!! HELLO!!!!
71 posted on 10/22/2003 7:14:48 AM PDT by beachn4fun (If you can read this, thank your mother for not having an abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lafroste
Get a camera today. Use Polaroid to prevent evil film developers from printing extras. If you do use 35 mm DO NOT TAKE IT TO WALMART ; )
72 posted on 10/22/2003 7:29:44 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Taglines are for the curious to read and the talented to write. Would someone write me one?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
You should click the link ... ;-)
73 posted on 10/22/2003 7:30:39 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

Comment #74 Removed by Moderator

To: runningbear
Hey Amber, why the long face?

75 posted on 10/22/2003 7:45:11 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
LMAO! Good one, you got my attention. ;^)
76 posted on 10/22/2003 7:56:53 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Does anyone else think this Amber women looks like the family robot on the Jetsons?
77 posted on 10/22/2003 8:13:24 AM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
I am totally prepared for Geragos trying to play the Jedi mind trick with words throughout the entire trial.
I saw this playing with words during our last contract negociation at work. They brought a lawyer in to change the language in our old contract, changed a word or two here and there. This little word change here and there caused a huge difference. Many people were surprized when the actually sat down and compared the changes.
78 posted on 10/22/2003 8:31:34 AM PDT by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
No prob! Just wanted to make sure you were in on this!
79 posted on 10/22/2003 8:39:07 AM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: maggiefluffs
(finger poised above link)...er..."JunkyardWillie".... ?
80 posted on 10/22/2003 8:41:10 AM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 901-908 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson