I wonder who it was that was manipulating the intelligence reports in 1999 when clinton bombed Iraq because Saddam kicked out the UN inspectors. Clinton had to bomb because Saddam had nuclear, bio and chemical weapons, at least that's what he told us.
In Feb. 2001 when Colin Powell argued that sanctions should not be lifted because Saddam was still a threat, why weren't we told that there was no threat from those countries (France being one)?
Blix was so sure there was something going on in Iraq that he wanted inspections to go on and on. He wouldn't have manipulated the intelligence just to keep his job, would he?
And why, oh why do none of these leftist pukes never address these questions?
Rather like this reporter's original story, manipulating a story with little regard for actual facts!