[prairiebreeze]

Only now are we realizing that Saddam not only posed no "imminent threat" to us, he posed no threat at all.

There are none so blind as those who refuse to see.

Another illustration of liberal racism. The author seems to care only about his own behind and not one bit about those of the Iraqi's whom we released from under Saddam's boot. Another hypocrite.

Prairie

[Socratic]

"Another illustration of liberal racism. The author seems to care only about his own behind and not one bit about those of the Iraqi's whom we released from under Saddam's boot. Another hypocrite."

I used a liberal friend's argument for undbridled Socialism against her. In the past she quoted, "Am I my brother's keeper?" I said yes I am, but I don't have to like the government extorting money from me and determining who my "brothers" are and how best to look after them. So, when she was ranting against the Iraqi War of Liberation, I asked her, "Am I my brother's keeper?" and went on to add that she has to determine who her "brothers" are on this Earth. She did not respond.

[gcruse]

The author seems to care only about his own behind and not one bit about those of the Iraqi's whom we released from under Saddam's boot.

So it's the US's job to go around freeing people from bad government?
How does promising not to attack North Korea fit into your noblesse oblige?

[talleyman]

liberal racism

I like that - say it again, daily, loudly. What's good for the goose...
And don't forget the best reason for going to war with Iraq: "It was for the children!"