To: CindyDawg
I agree. I think though the law that was passed was only for the feeding and not specific or broad enough to take into consdieration every case and scenario.
But I just hate to see folks (reading some comments on this thread) jumping mad as if she was kidnapped and dumped somewhere to die.
It's emotional enough as it is without distorting the news (innocently).
To: RedBloodedAmerican
It's breaking news, done in a hurry.
Give your picky differences a break and quit fighting meaningless trivia.
The "HINO" (and his pro-death/euthanisia-crazed lawyers and the the money-grubbing "hospice") have been fighting the "family" for years - trying to kill Terri, with legal BS, lies, and no care.
The meaning is clear.
The 10 year attempted murder is clear as well.
520 posted on
10/22/2003 7:13:30 PM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only support FR by donating monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: RedBloodedAmerican
It depends. The dehydration was to be reversed. Wouldn't this cover treatment up to a certain point for complications from this? I agree it's not a blanket though.
To: RedBloodedAmerican
just heard on CNN that a new guardian won't be able to do much and that Lucifer will remain her guardian. The only thing he won't be able to do is pull her feeding tube. Now this sucks big time if true. Oh BTW also said Terri was back on life support...Gee I guess we all are on life support if we eat
531 posted on
10/22/2003 7:15:29 PM PDT by
fiesti
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson