Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rove, McClellan Interviewed in Leak Probe
ap | 10-23-03 | yoely

Posted on 10/23/2003 2:27:29 PM PDT by yoely

WASHINGTON - The FBI (news - web sites) has interviewed more than three dozen Bush administration officials, including political adviser Karl Rove and press secretary Scott McClellan, in its investigation into the leak of an undercover CIA (news - web sites) officer's identity.

AP Photo

Reuters Slideshow: Probe Into Leaked CIA Identity

The interviews have extended beyond the White House to other government agencies. The Defense and State departments and the CIA itself also are part of the probe.

The focus, however, remains on the White House, two law enforcement officials said on condition of anonymity. While the initial, informal interviews have yielded no major breaks, the FBI is satisfied that the dozen agents assigned to the probe are making progress and have not encountered any stalling tactics, the officials said Thursday.

So far, no grand jury subpoenas have been issued, they said.

Boxloads of documents have been forwarded to the FBI team, including White House phone logs and e-mails. More documents are being produced, as the contents of individual items sometimes lead agents to request additional materials, one official said.

Investigators want to know who leaked the name of Valerie Plame, an undercover CIA officer, to syndicated columnist Robert Novak in July. Plame is married to former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson, who has said he believes his wife's identity was disclosed to discredit his assertions that the Bush administration exaggerated Iraq (news - web sites)'s nuclear capabilities to build the case for war.

Leaking of classified information, such as an undercover officer's name, is a criminal offense.

Democrats repeatedly have urged Attorney General John Ashcroft (news - web sites) to appoint a special counsel or recuse himself because of his close political ties to the White House. They also question why the Justice Department (news - web sites) waited several days after the investigation began to ask White House staffers to preserve documents.

"It demands a full, fair and fearless investigation that is above politics," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y. "But so far, the way this probe has been conducted falls quite short of that bar."

Ashcroft, who has strongly condemned the leak, has not ruled out stepping aside but has said he believes his agency can conduct a thorough, impartial investigation.

Ashcroft's public statements about the leak mirror those included in a review he sent to Congress almost exactly one year ago — long before the Plame case.

Leaks can compromise intelligence sources and methods and damage military operations, Ashcroft said in the review, requested by Congress as part of the 2002 intelligence authorization bill. Those responsible for them should be punished, he said.

"Until those who, without authority, reveal classified material are deterred by the real prospect of productive investigations and strict application of appropriate penalties, they will have no reason to stop their harmful actions," Ashcroft wrote.

Government agencies and departments should swiftly pursue investigations of suspected leaks and immediately request Justice Department involvement if a crime appears to have been committed, Ashcroft said.

Democrats have raised questions about the months that passed between publication of Plame's name by Novak in July and the initiation three weeks ago of a formal Justice Department investigation. Justice officials say it took the CIA that long to complete a questionnaire used to justify an investigation.

Despite the talk of progress in the probe, President Bush (news - web sites) himself has said the leaker's identity may never be found. In his review a year ago, Ashcroft noted that only one non-espionage leak case has been successfully prosecuted in the past half-century.

"In most cases, identifying the individual who disclosed classified information without authority has been difficult, at best," Ashcroft wrote.

___


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/23/2003 2:27:29 PM PDT by yoely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yoely
"The focus, however, remains on the White House, two law enforcement officials said on condition of anonymity. "

A leak about the leak? They should be investigated and imprisoned.

2 posted on 10/23/2003 2:58:48 PM PDT by bayourod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoely
"Democrats have raised questions about the months that passed between publication of Plame's name by Novak in July and the initiation three weeks ago of a formal Justice Department investigation."

Maybe Democrats should also raise questions about the recent "retirement" of Plame's boss, Alan Foley.
3 posted on 10/23/2003 3:10:38 PM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoely
Investigators want to know who leaked the name of Valerie Plame, an undercover CIA officer, to syndicated columnist Robert Novak in July. Plame is married to former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson, who has said he believes his wife's identity was disclosed to discredit his assertions that the Bush administration exaggerated Iraq (news - web sites)'s nuclear capabilities to build the case for war.

Leaking of classified information, such as an undercover officer's name, is a criminal offense.

This phrasing in bold drives me nuts. Presumably the writer meant "who leaked his wife's employer". After all, Wilson himself lists his wife as "The former Valerie Plame" on his bio for all to see.

4 posted on 10/23/2003 3:26:37 PM PDT by cyncooper (We call evil by its name...President George W. Bush to the Australian Parliament)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Hecks
Maybe Democrats should also raise questions about the recent "retirement" of Plame's boss, Alan Foley.

Exactly.

Hope the FBI plans a little chat with the Wilsons themselves, too.

5 posted on 10/23/2003 3:28:10 PM PDT by cyncooper (We call evil by its name...President George W. Bush to the Australian Parliament)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ben Hecks
Plame had not been undercover for the past four years, so there is no law against revealing her name.
6 posted on 10/23/2003 3:30:00 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eva
"Plame had not been undercover for the past four years, so there is no law against revealing her name."

You are most likely correct. I think I read that Joe met Valerie in 1998 - it's very possible that she did not have an overseas assignment after that. This is Valerie's second marriage, Joe's third.
7 posted on 10/23/2003 3:54:02 PM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
"A leak about the leak? They should be investigated and imprisoned."

I thought someone would beat me to it, but that was fast!
LOL!
8 posted on 10/23/2003 4:18:05 PM PDT by sarasmom (Thank you, everyone who prayed for Terri Schiavo. Keep praying, please !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ben Hecks
It was stated on Opinion Journal that Plame had been stationed in DC for past four years and no longer undercover. This is just another leftist lie campaign.
9 posted on 10/23/2003 6:02:56 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson