Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Rumsfeld Losing His Mojo?
TIME ^ | 10-26-03 | MICHAEL DUFFY AND DOUGLAS WALLER

Posted on 10/26/2003 6:37:49 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

Facing persistent enemy attacks in Iraq, the Defense Secretary now finds himself fighting battles at home too

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was having one of his irregular chats with Senators last Wednesday, speaking in the secret, soundproof fourth-floor Capitol chamber used for highly classified conversations, when someone interjected the question that was on everyone's mind. "What troop levels do we expect to have in Iraq a year from now?" asked Senator Bill Frist, the Republican leader. And with that, the Pentagon chief began to tap dance. His reply, according to a Republican Senator in the room, was a classic Rumsfeldian fugue—complete with interesting hand gestures—mentioning reductions and foreign troops and steady progress. Or, as the G.O.P. Senator described it later, "it was a five-minute, total nonanswer, just unbelievably obtuse." Another Republican Senator put it this way to TIME: "Rumsfeld believes in his own magic."

It is increasingly fair to ask: Does anyone else? For nearly three years as Defense Secretary, Rumsfeld has employed everything from smiling charm to podium-pounding bluntness in his battles with Congress, the Pentagon bureaucracy and his colleagues in the Bush Administration over who controls foreign policy. But his recent pronouncements, both public and private, have grown into a regular political distraction for a President who is already on the defensive for his handling of the Iraq war and its aftermath—both of which were designed largely by Rumsfeld himself.

[snip]

(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: pentagon; rummy; rumsfeld; terrorism; war; wishfulthinking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
The Pentagon and White House October 22, 2003 defended a memorandum from Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to top defense officials questioning progress in the war on terrorism and warning that the United States faced 'a long, hard slog' in Iraq and Afghanistan. Sharply diverging from more upbeat public comments, Rumsfeld wrote that it was not possible to transform the Defense Department quickly enough to effectively fight the anti-terrorism war. Rumsfeld listens to a question during a press briefing at the Pentagon, October 21.  (Mike Theiler/Reuters)
Wed Oct 22, 5:18 PM ET

1 posted on 10/26/2003 6:37:49 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: section9
Hey, Chris, looky here! Time is going along with Reuters/MSNBC!

Coordinated attack! Talkiing points!

They really think we are stupid, don't they?

2 posted on 10/26/2003 6:40:36 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Losing his what?
3 posted on 10/26/2003 6:40:37 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
They couldn't carry Rummy's jockstrap.
4 posted on 10/26/2003 6:47:30 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
mo·jo ( P ) Pronunciation Key (mj)
n. pl. mo·jos or mo·joes
1. A magic charm or spell.
2. An amulet, often a small flannel bag containing one or more magic items, worn by adherents of hoodoo or voodoo.
3. Personal magnetism; charm.

5 posted on 10/26/2003 6:47:35 AM PST by New Horizon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
MORE PONY PUCKS!
6 posted on 10/26/2003 6:48:34 AM PST by SwinneySwitch (Liberalism is a Sin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
LOL! Even Time is getting in on the act!!

Give it up, leftwingnuts...Rumsfeld is awesome, and he has been an essential person in our winning War on Terror.

Man, the way these people write, you'd think they want the terrorists to win.

I GUARANTEE THIS:
The two groups that MOST WANT Don Rumsfeld to be fired are:

1. Al Qaeda
2. The Democrat National Committee.

And not necessarily in that order. This should speak for itself.

7 posted on 10/26/2003 6:49:55 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Terry's been working overtime.
8 posted on 10/26/2003 6:50:59 AM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: facedown
Terry's been working overtime.

Indeed.

9 posted on 10/26/2003 6:54:24 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
RRRiiiggghhttt.... Uhhuh.....

What RINO Senators did they talk to? And... I wouldn't doubt their statements were revised to fit Time's agenda.

10 posted on 10/26/2003 6:54:55 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
you'd think they want the terrorists to win

That about sums it up.

11 posted on 10/26/2003 6:57:01 AM PST by Rome2000 (McCarthy was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Is Time Participating in an Orchestrated Attack?

With public trust in the news media now at the lowest levels ever measured, Democratic-leaning reporters and editors face increasing difficulty in presenting their own politics as the ersatz "national consensus."

Increasingly viewed by the public as blatant shills for liberal politics and the Democratic Party, established news organs like Time Magazine continue to bleat out the same, tired, "Republicans are in difficulty, Democrats are on the rise" mantra that has long characterized their contribution to public discourse.

The so-called "wolf-pack" phenomenon, in which multiple blatant shills for the Democratic Party simultaneously discover importance in the same "news" story, creating an echo chamber of strikingly obvious liberal propaganda, has given rise to theories of conspiracy, and charges of an organized "liberal slant" to the news.

We asked Professor Elmo Fuddrucker, noted authority, about these charges. "It's nonsense. There is no conspiracy among liberal reporters to hammer the same theme from multiple outlets. No, it's just that they are all highly partisan and not very bright. They can recognize a promising line of attack on Republicans when they see one, and are anxious to jump on it. It might appear that the arrival of multiple new stories about the same empty speculation is coordinated, but in fact it's just stupid people behaving like sheep."

Excerpted...

12 posted on 10/26/2003 6:59:07 AM PST by Nick Danger (The Wright Brothers were not the first to fly. They were the first to LAND.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
I confidently believe Rumsfeld will come through this solar flare inflicted by the pundits with nary a scratch.
13 posted on 10/26/2003 7:00:36 AM PST by ejo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
Newsweek is following the pack:
Header
.appnwk_102503_rumsfeld { width:138px;font-family:arial, helvetica; font-size:10pt;} .hednwk_102503_rumsfeld { font-size: 13pt; font-family:Times Roman; font-weight:bold;color:cc0000; } .decknwk_102503_rumsfeld { font-weight:bold; } .subhednwk_102503_rumsfeld { font-size: 14px; font-family:arial; font-weight:bold; } .lvtextnwk_102503_rumsfeld { font-family:arial, helvetica; font-size:10pt;} .lvtext2nwk_102503_rumsfeld { font-family:arial, helvetica; font-size:10pt;;}
Should Donald Rumsfeld keep his job as secretary of Defense?
Yes. He's managed Iraq as well as anyone could
No. He's misled the public--and maybe Bush, too
I don't know
Vote to see results 

Should Donald Rumsfeld keep his job as secretary of Defense?
* 535 responses
Yes. He's managed Iraq as well as anyone could
 16%
No. He's misled the public--and maybe Bush, too
 77%
I don't know
 7%
Survey results tallied every 60 seconds. Live Votes reflect respondents' views and are not scientifically valid surveys.

14 posted on 10/26/2003 7:00:56 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Thank GAWD he is shedding that dumb Mojo thingy in favor of more good ole gravitas!
15 posted on 10/26/2003 7:06:12 AM PST by carlo3b (http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Ho-hum.

Republicans talking to the media about Rummy are doing so for one reason. The leaked BRAC list. They think that if they can get rid of Rummy, they can save some bases. Rummy will stay and the bases will go.

16 posted on 10/26/2003 7:13:24 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Is Rumsfeld Losing His Mojo?

Time should find something else to worry about.

Mr. Secretary...you're still "da man"!

17 posted on 10/26/2003 7:41:18 AM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"What troop levels do we expect to have in Iraq a year from now?" asked Senator Bill Frist.

No, Dr. Frist; you should be asking what else is needed to insure the mission's success and see that he gets it.

Where's Newt when we need him?
18 posted on 10/26/2003 7:45:50 AM PST by NewRomeTacitus (Inject Mumia, free Tommy, pen Willy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
Time should find something else to worry about.

The problem with Time and all the rest of the pack of jackals is they don't
understand the word "metric" as used by Rummy.

The recent "leaked memo" should INCREASE, not shake, the confidence in Rummy of
anyone with an IQ higher than room-temp.

The memo was a classic example of what A WORLD-CLASS manager does: keep probing his
staff to think and try to clearly define an end-goal and clearly select the best
route to the end-goals from a myriad of lesser routes.

But Time, Inc. and their jackal-pack should be expected to act the way they do.
They are in favor of all sorts of guvmint boondoogles that a couple of METRICS would show
are total failures, but they prop them up because they make them feel good...
or win votes for losers like the current batch of Democratic Presidential hopefuls.
19 posted on 10/26/2003 7:52:10 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
What RINO Senators did they talk to?

No doubt two of the four who voted against banning the practice of sucking the brains out of newborn infants and crushing their skulls.

20 posted on 10/26/2003 8:53:23 AM PST by alnick (Pray that God will grant wisdom to American voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson