To: Sloth
How about anyone retiring in the next three years gets 100% of the benefit they now expect to receive, then the fraction is pro-rated down over the next forty years (i.e., retire 4 years from now & get 97.5%; five, 95%, etc., down to 39 years, 2.5%). Not a bad idea....
8 posted on
10/26/2003 5:49:46 PM PST by
Lunatic Fringe
(I'm normally not a praying man, but if you're up there, please save me Superman.)
To: Lunatic Fringe; Sloth
I don't think a 40 year program is a good idea, maybe 15-20 years. Tough it out. Allow some kind of refund or even partial refund for those who opt out earlier.
9 posted on
10/26/2003 5:53:32 PM PST by
GeronL
(Please visit www.geocities.com/geronl)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson