Of course not. In my view, however, it is important to keep up the pressure against islamism (and islamic chauvanism more generally) and at the same time encourage and defend mainstream/moderate/modernist/secularist/traditionalist/minority sect muslims. The carrot and the stick should work together.
An overly tolerant (politically-correct/muliculturalist) approach to Islam ultimately provides space for the islamic extremists to disperse their poison, and allows them to slither into positions of leadership that are sponsored and recognized by the multiculturalist intelligencia, but not genuinely earned in the broader muslim community.
While individual muslims must be protected, and their individual and religious rights must be protected, Islam itself should NOT be protected from external criticism. Such criticism will serve, IMHO, to strengthen diversity, creativity and tolerance within Islam, and spur the development of internal criticism as well. This is what happened with Christianity, which both liberalized (in the best sense of the term) and realized renewed vigor and fecundity under the withering criticism of enlightenment skepticism.
Yes. The truest islam that the world has seen for centuries was the taliban. The koran commands the islamics to be murderers and terrorists. The religion cannot be reformed and still be islam.
Ann Coulter had it right, we need to invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. That is the only way to fix the islam problem.