I watched last night for a few minutes only, because it made me sick to watch the creep (the husband). As for Larry King, we have to give him credit for airing the interview. He gave hubby a chance to air his side, and then he gave callers a chance to pummel hubby.
Larry has a talent of letting people relax and then revealing their worst side. I remember an interview he did at least ten years ago with the father of a burn victim. "Rothenberg" was the father's name, and he had set his son on fire when the kid was a young boy, approx. 8 years old. He had custody of the kid and took him to a motel room and then set the room on fire. This was in the mid-80's. The kid survived but had to have years of reconstructive surgery and was terribly deformed.
When Larry interviewed him, you could see he was phrasing his questions very carefully. He got the man talking and it showed the father's total selfishness and evil spirit. I have to give him credit for his interviewing skills. By the way, that father spent years in jail for his crime.
People have different feelings about the way her case should have been handled after her injury. But for people, including the parents, to claim that the husband actually caused it (a) when such a claim would have been the best defense in the med mal trial and apparently didn't come up at all and (b) when the "evidence" comes from this publicity hound hack Baden is just a total crock - but you have many folks here on FR repeating it as gospel truth. Perhaps more people should be reading CP's threads on defamation law.