To: Saundra Duffy
An evil money-grubbing monster is not supposed to be appointed as a legal guardian for a vulnerable disabled person. Furthermore, it's against the law to starve and withhold water from farm animals. By the way, Michael Schiavo is living with another woman and has impregnated her twice (apparently). He's not her husband anymore in the real sense. He is her husband, thus legally her guardian...as for the rest.....who cares....just because you don't like it does not make it untrue......
50 posted on
10/29/2003 4:59:28 PM PST by
Legerdemain
(The GodSquad, The worst of the Thought Police)
To: Legerdemain
He is her husband, thus legally her guardian...as for the rest.....who cares....just because you don't like it does not make it untrue...... And Saddam was IRAQI's BIG DADDY TOO......was that ok also????
56 posted on
10/29/2003 5:02:57 PM PST by
pollywog
(Psalm 121;1 I Lift mine eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
To: Legerdemain
Just because he is her husband, does not mean he owns her.
He was not the first guardian in this case. There was a court appointed guardian that said she should not have her feeding tube removed on Michael's say so. Michael's attorney managed to get Judge Greer to appoint Michael and remove the other guardian. Judge Greer refused to look at the evdience and witnesses that the family had provided.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson