The thread however has been loaded down with goofy-legal-leze and I hope that will soon stop so we all can reflect on the compassionate nature of the article.
There was a comment in the article, that I felt was so true about the courts and Terri's case especially. I feel that I have to place some emphasis on it in this post.
"Courts have labored mightily in the vineyards of greedy relatives, diabolical murderers and petty friends for over 500 years to develop will and probate laws that avoid such he said/she said contentions when there are no written documents from decedents who can no longer speak.
Written proof, not assertions by those who have financial conflicts of interest, determines intent.
BOOM!! That is what Terri's fight is all about!!