To: kellynla
I agree in general with your post except for the part about them finally getting it. I don't think they ever will. There are none so blind as those who will not see.
To: 17th Miss Regt
Well it is all of our responsibilities to keep the pressure on and educate everyone that THIS DEVASTATION COULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED!!! Thinning the forests and controlled burns are absolutely paramount! A healthy forest would be able to combat the bark bettle and thinning the forest would need less water and create a healthier forest!
13 posted on
10/30/2003 8:23:43 AM PST by
kellynla
("C" 1/5 1st Mar Div. Viet Nam 69 &70 Semper Fi!)
To: 17th Miss Regt
I agree in general with your post except for the part about them finally getting it. I don't think they ever will. There are none so blind as those who will not see. It's not that they don't see, it's that there are hidden incentives.
Outfits like Weyrhauser which own huge tracts of private timber land would have the value of their holdings increased if there was no logging on federal lands to compete with them.
Mega-wealthy people who like their home in the wilderness will not have to feel crowded if common people are unable to build due to not being able to get fire insurance
Whenever you ask "why don't they", the answer can be discovered by looking for who benefits from conditions the way they are
21 posted on
10/30/2003 1:31:52 PM PST by
SauronOfMordor
(Java/C++/Unix/Web Developer === (Finally employed again! Whoopie))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson