Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry
From the article: "I have no inside information, but I wonder if the committee was swayed by the fact that Damadian, although a brilliant inventor, is apparently a creation science nut. ..."

Being nuts is not a disqualification for science prizes, although they did scope out John Nash before allowing him on the platform. I think if you look at the prizes awarded to physicists in the early 20th century you could find some justifiably hurt feelings.

11 posted on 10/31/2003 7:50:16 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
Being nuts is not a disqualification for science prizes, although they did scope out John Nash before allowing him on the platform.

And justifiably so; the last thing the Nobel Committee needs is for one of it's prize winners to announce he's the "Emperor of Antarctica" during his acceptance speech.

17 posted on 10/31/2003 8:12:23 AM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson