The only way to prevent wildfires is to actively remove dead trees and to thin the forests — which reduces fuel-load build up.
Posted on 10/31/2003 6:31:26 PM PST by doug from upland
Patrick Moore grew up in the rainforests of the Pacific Northwest — and holds a doctorate in ecology from the University of British Columbia. A self-described "radical environmental activist," he was one of the founders of Greenpeace, and one of the most radical eco-extremists.
In recent years, however, former Greenpeace friends have branded Dr. Moore as an "eco-Judas" because he came to realize that the positions taken by Greenpeace and other groups in regard to forests and forestry were actually "anti-environmental."
Since breaking with Greenpeace in 1986, Moore has spoken out tirelessly in defense of a more sensible appreciation of the environmental benefits of sustainable forestry.
For a wider sampling of Dr. Moore's views on sustainable forestry, visit his website: www.greenspirit.com.
=====================================================
Greenpeace recently issued a report claiming that it is better to let our forests burn to the ground than to adopt programs that will reduce catastrophic wildfire. As an ecologist, I can tell you that this approach ultimately leads to soil destruction, air and water pollution, and wildfires that can kill every living thing in our forests — all in the name of "saving the forests."
Having dedicated my life to the environment, I am always concerned when the forces of nature meet face-to-face with the forces of politics. This is especially true when the forces of nature are coming in loud and clear: Approximately 90 million acres of our nation's public forests are at risk of catastrophic wildfire right now. Every year we see millions of acres of forest burn when this could be prevented.
We live in an era when many activists believe we should leave our forests alone — an ecologically dangerous policy that sets our forests up to be destroyed not just by fire, but by insects and disease. It is especially bewildering when you consider how simple it is, through the application of time-tested forest management practices, to maintain forests in a state that reduces the chance of such outcomes.
The root of the problem is that when we protect our forests from wildfires, over time they become susceptible to disease and to catastrophic wildfires as fuel loads build up. The only way to prevent this is to actively remove dead trees and to thin the forest. The active management of these forests is necessary to protect human life and property, along with air, water and wildlife. This does not prevent us from also maintaining a world-class system of parks and wilderness areas where industrial activity is restricted or banned.
The only way to prevent wildfires is to actively remove dead trees and to thin the forests — which reduces fuel-load build up. |
This is not the case.
When we buy wood we send a signal into the marketplace to plant more trees, and produce more wood. One of the main reasons there is still about the same area of forested land in the U.S. today as there was 100 years ago is because we use so much wood. Agriculture and urbanization cause forest loss, not forestry.
The inferno that began in the Bandelier National Monument near Los Alamos, N.M. in May 2000 is a classic case in point. The park officials who started this fire did so with good intentions. But they failed to take into account that more than 50 years of fire prevention had resulted in a fuel load build-up that nearly guaranteed what ensued: hundreds of homes destroyed and thousands of acres of forest lost.
The only solution in these circumstances is removal of wood to reduce the fuel load. In some types of forests, it may be possible to manage fuel loads with prescribed fire. In other forest types, especially where there are homes and other property at risk, mechanical thinning and harvesting are the best options.
It is unfortunate that some organizations characterize the need to implement active management of national forests as damaging to the environment. It is actually the only way to break the present environmentally destructive pattern of fuel build-up that often results in catastrophic outcomes.
At the Western Governors' Association summit in mid-June in Missoula, Montana, the topic was forest health. Earlier in the month, the House passed a bill that would hopefully improve forest officials' ability to properly manage the forests. The Senate began hearings on this bill June 26.
I hope that those responsible for our forests will bring about the very necessary changes in law and practice — and return the forces of nature to a more desirable state.
Reprinted with Permission of the Wall Street Journal, Copyright 2003. Dow Jones and Company. All Rights Reserved.
Send this story to a friend | Most sent stories
| ESPN.com: Help | Media Kit |
Contact Us | Tools | Jobs at ESPN.com |
 |
||
 |
|
More Useful Everyday |
|
|
||
|
||
|
|
 |
|
|
||
| ©2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. |
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
For real time political chat - Radio Free Republic chat room
Dr. Moore was an idiot who let his relgious beliefs in enviornmentalism cloud his judgement. Most of the eco-terrorist/cults have or had good intentions, they just happen to have people with blind faith, and a hatred of the science they claim to espouse and claim as dogma.
Originally yes, especially those misguided souls who came to environmentalism from that fraud of a book "Silent Spring". Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, however, environmentalism is serving as the front for all the old socialisst. Those who used to want to destroy our way of life so that we might be more like the Soviet Union are now wanting to destory our way of life to save the environment.
These people are Watermelons: Green on the outside, but pink on the inside.
LOL!!! I've got to remember that one!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.