To: vannrox
Voting machine code should be kept the most highly protected secret the nation has. It's the only way to assure that only official sources will be able to tamper with the electoral process.
4 posted on
11/01/2003 11:23:20 AM PST by
templar
To: templar
I wonder if a secret Gov't agency should be designing this stuff, instead of public companies. That is just begging for trouble.
6 posted on
11/01/2003 11:25:57 AM PST by
rs79bm
(Insert Democratic principles and ideals here: .............this space intentionally left blank.....)
To: templar
Voting machine code should be kept the most highly protected secret the nation has. It's the only way to assure that only official sources will be able to tamper with the electoral process. Nonsense. It should be fully public. If the system is well-designed, publicizing the code will not compromise security but will allow people to verify that the election is on the up-and-up. By contrast, if the code is a super-tightly-kept secret, then it becomes impossible for anyone to know whether the code that's being run is legitimate. Even if the source code is made available to auditors, unless they are given full compilable copies there's no way for autitors to confirm that the source code they inspect bears any relationship whatsoever to the code that's actually being used.
17 posted on
11/01/2003 12:21:01 PM PST by
supercat
(Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson