To: AAABEST
There was a thread on this about a week ago where I was defending this guy for guarding his property .... allow me to take a minute to say taht this guy should be wired for sound at this point.
Killing criminals is one thing ... shooting them in the back is quite another. Misdemeanors do not rate pursuit and use of deadly force.
3 posted on
11/03/2003 3:56:58 AM PST by
Centurion2000
(Virtue untested is innocence)
To: Centurion2000
I agree with you 100%. I'm a big 2a guy like you, but this is bad news on many levels including giving responsible gun owners a bad name.
6 posted on
11/03/2003 4:08:04 AM PST by
AAABEST
To: Centurion2000
Well stated, I am in the same boat. To shoot anyone in the back is a cowardly and disgusting act.
16 posted on
11/03/2003 5:20:55 AM PST by
fml
( You can twist perception, reality won't budge. -RUSH)
To: Centurion2000
I totally agree. Many posters thought the homeowner was protecting his property at night using deadly force only to find out that the boy was unjustly killed.
I am glad to see a post correcting a past comment once the facts are clear.
To: Centurion2000
There was a thread on this about a week ago where I was defending this guy for guarding his property .... allow me to take a minute to say taht this guy should be wired for sound at this point.Killing criminals is one thing ... shooting them in the back is quite another. Misdemeanors do not rate pursuit and use of deadly force.
Same here. I believed this fellow's story before, but now it's starting to stink. If it's true that he shot the kid in the back, I hope he rots in prison.
32 posted on
11/03/2003 8:31:22 AM PST by
Frunabulax
("If the truth will kill them, let them die.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson