To: unix
If a Von Neumann probe only finds evidence of primitive life (such as an unstable, savage Type 0 civilization) they might simply lie dormant on the moon, silently waiting for the Type 0 civilization to evolve into a stable Type I civilization. After waiting quietly for several millennia, they may be activated when the emerging Type I civilization is advanced enough to set up a lunar colony. Physicist Paul Davies of the University of Adelaide has even raised the possibility of a Von Neumann probe resting on our own moon, left over from a previous visitation in our system aeons ago.(If this sounds a bit familiar, that's because it was the basis of the film, 2001. Originally, Stanley Kubrick began the film with a series of scientists explaining how probes like these would be the most efficient method of exploring outer space. Unfortunately, at the last minute, Kubrick cut the opening segment from his film, and these monoliths became almost mystical entities)
19 posted on
11/03/2003 1:28:06 PM PST by
Liberal Classic
(No better friend, no worse enemy.)
To: Liberal Classic
(If this sounds a bit familiar, that's because it was the basis of the film, 2001. Originally, Stanley Kubrick began the film with a series of scientists explaining how probes like these would be the most efficient method of exploring outer space. Unfortunately, at the last minute, Kubrick cut the opening segment from his film, and these monoliths became almost mystical entities) It's been a long time, but I don't even think Clarke went into much detail about the monoliths in the book. Kubrick also cut narration for the movie, which made it even more mysterious. And the surviving dialog would fit on a few pages. The movie ended up being a feast of sight and sound, that infuriated, bored, and thrilled differing groups.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson