Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton & Khobar--One of the keys to understanding the war over the war on terrorism.
National Review ^ | 11-3-03 | Rich Lowry

Posted on 11/03/2003 4:20:33 PM PST by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 11/03/2003 4:20:34 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
2 posted on 11/03/2003 4:23:04 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
BTTT!
3 posted on 11/03/2003 4:26:50 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
classic klintoon
4 posted on 11/03/2003 4:32:34 PM PST by robomatik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
classic klintoon
5 posted on 11/03/2003 4:32:47 PM PST by robomatik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
just sickening
6 posted on 11/03/2003 4:40:00 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The Clinton Administration and Internationalist State Deprtment. How do I hate you. Let me count the ways:
1. Putting the needs of the UN and other international institutions before the US.
2. Putting the feeling of other nations above the national security of the US.
3. Putting the almighty dollar and trade above the lives of Americans.
7 posted on 11/03/2003 4:52:39 PM PST by rmlew (Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
The Clinton Administration and Internationalist State Deprtment. How do I hate you. Let me count the ways:

Sorry to have to make this comment, but it's the GWB Internationalist State Deprtment now, and I don't think it's any better.

8 posted on 11/03/2003 4:55:18 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
You may turn up foreign state involvement, in which case, you've got to do something about it, and that might mean body bags coming back on the evening news. Or you don't do anything about it and you look weak.

They did not do anything about it and did look weak. The animals that populate the middle east saw this and pushed on to bolder and bolder attacks. Next came the USS Cole. Later 9-11. As Patick Henry wrote, "Who fears the wrath of cowards?" It has been said before that Clinton bears the brunt of the blame for 9-11. I would go one step further, his criminal negligence directly lead to the death of 3000 people. But he can sleep at night knowing he did not have to use the US military against the poor opressed Iranians or Saudis who harbor an "understandable" hatred towards the west. After all, the only people Clinton ever used miltary force agaist were white eurpopeans and of course the group he held in highest contempt, American citizens.

9 posted on 11/03/2003 4:59:39 PM PST by Guard Dog (A patriot never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"Sorry to have to make this comment, but it's the GWB Internationalist State Deprtment now, and I don't think it's any better."

You must be joking, right?
10 posted on 11/03/2003 5:05:06 PM PST by JSloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JSloth
"Sorry to have to make this comment, but it's the GWB Internationalist State Deprtment now, and I don't think it's any better."...You must be joking, right?

No, I'm not saying GWB is in sync with State's agenda, but it's his responsibility, and it's not much different now than under Clinton. I think it's time GWB made State over in his image.

11 posted on 11/03/2003 5:08:09 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Sorry to have to make this comment, but it's the GWB Internationalist State Deprtment now, and I don't think it's any better.

I think that Saddam and the Taliban may differ slightly with your assessment of the situation.

12 posted on 11/03/2003 5:13:28 PM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
fyi
13 posted on 11/03/2003 5:13:43 PM PST by jla (http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I agree with your comment. The gains made in the WOT have been made AGAINST the wishes and will of those careerists in the State Department, which for 70 years has been against this country and its security.

As in the CIA and the FBI, State it well past due on a total housecleaning by our beloved President. the cost of mandatory retirements would be nothing compared to the increase in security that getting rid of the anti-Americans in state would yield.
14 posted on 11/03/2003 5:23:51 PM PST by exit82 (Sound off to your elected reps in DC: Capitol switchboard toll free number 1-800-648-3516.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
It's a truly ugly story, isn't it?

The Morris response tells us everything we need to know about the inhabitant of the White House. As if we didn't already know, that is.

When there were new depths of cowardice, callousness and corruption to plumb, the Clinton administration never disappointed us. They unerringly found the bottom...then dug a little deeper.

15 posted on 11/03/2003 5:24:16 PM PST by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob
You're suggesting Iraq was a State Dept iniative? Afghanistan, maybe, partly.

It's the neocon Executive branch that devised our post 9/11 strategy, not the State Dept.

Yes, Colin Powell is better than Maddy, but the underlings are the same.

For State, Term 2, we need


16 posted on 11/03/2003 5:25:25 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: exit82
total housecleaning by our beloved President. the cost of mandatory retirements would be nothing compared to the increase in security that getting rid of the anti-Americans in state would yield.

Yup, second term we need

Maybe we should start a FR draft Newt campaign?

17 posted on 11/03/2003 5:27:26 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: robomatik
And .. for once Dicky Morris was right .. Clinton had no stomach for terrorism and therefore paid no attention to it.
18 posted on 11/03/2003 7:31:14 PM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
btttttttt
19 posted on 11/03/2003 7:55:30 PM PST by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
bttt
20 posted on 11/04/2003 10:36:44 AM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson