Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Circulation of the Nation's 20 Biggest Newspapers.
AP ^ | 11/03/03 | AP

Posted on 11/03/2003 5:42:14 PM PST by Pikamax

Circulation of the Nation's 20 Biggest Newspapers The Associated Press Published: Nov 3, 2003

Average weekday circulation of the nation's 20 biggest newspapers for the six months ended Sept. 30, as reported Monday by the Audit Bureau of Circulations. The percentage changes are from the comparable year-ago period.

1. USA Today, 2,246,996, up 0.7 percent

2. The Wall Street Journal, 2,091,062, up 16.1 percent (a)

3. The New York Times, 1,118,565, up 0.5 percent

4. Los Angeles Times, 955,211, down 1.1 percent (b)

5. The Washington Post, 732,872, down 1.9 percent

6. New York Daily News, 729,124, up 2.1 percent

7. New York Post, 652,426, up 10.6 percent

8. Chicago Tribune, 613,509 (NM)

9. Newsday of New York's Long Island, 580,069, up 0.2 percent

10. Houston Chronicle, 553,018, up 0.2 percent (b)

11. The Dallas Morning News, 525,441, up 0.7 percent

12. San Francisco Chronicle, 512,640, up 0.1 percent

13. Chicago Sun-Times, 481,798, up 0.5 percent

14. The Boston Globe, 450,538, down 3.7 percent

15. The Arizona Republic, 432,284, down 3.7 percent (b)

16. The Star-Ledger of Newark, N.J., 408,672 (NM)

17. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 382,421, up 0.2 percent

18. Star Tribune of Minneapolis-St. Paul, 380,354, up 0.3 percent (b)

19. The Philadelphia Inquirer, 376,493, up 0.7 percent

20. The Plain Dealer, Cleveland, 365,288, up 0.4 percent (b)

---

(a) Beginning with this reporting period, The Wall Street Journal's total paid subscription figure includes subscribers to its online edition that meet the qualifications for paid subscription under ABC guidelines. In this period, 290,412 online subscribers qualified under the ABC's definition. Without the online subscribers, the amount of paid print subscribers - 1,800,650 - was essentially unchanged from the same period a year ago.

(b) Includes Saturday circulation

(NM) Change from year-ago period too small to be meaningful in percentage terms.

Source: Audit Bureau of Circulations.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arizonarepublic; atc; bostonglobe; chicagosuntimes; chicagotribune; clevelandplaindealer; dailynews; dallasmorningnews; houstonchronicle; lat; losangelestimes; media; newarkstarledger; newsday; newspapers; newyorkdailynews; newyorknewsday; newyorkpost; newyorktimes; nyp; nyt; nytschadenfreude; philadephiainquirer; plaindealer; schadenfreude; sfchronicle; starledger; startribune; suntimes; thenewyorktimes; thewallstreetjournal; usatoday; wallstreetjournal; washingtonpost; wsj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...

Schadenfreude

This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.


21 posted on 11/03/2003 9:01:13 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
We are densley populated, and we love our papers, we used to have bunches more!

How to spot the fake New Yorker: Have them pronounce "Staten Island Advance".

22 posted on 11/03/2003 9:03:36 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rightone
WSJ nearly twice the circulation of the NY Times and the LA Times. Didn't know that and that is GOOD news.

As the WSJ likes to say itself, they're about the only paper in the county that a lot of people subscribe to just for the editorial page.

23 posted on 11/03/2003 9:16:52 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
The New York Times, 1,118,565, up 0.5 percent

"HmmmMmMmMmmMmMMMMmmmmm...."

24 posted on 11/03/2003 9:28:56 PM PST by martin_fierro (_____oooo_( ° ¿ ° )_oooo_____)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
I think it is legit to include the WSJ online subscriptions as, unlike the other fishwraps, you really do have to pay to get their paper. There version is just another means of distribution.

To qualify the on-line suscription must be at least 25% of the cost of the print paper. If you don't get the print paper, the on-line is $79/yr. If you get the paper, it is $39, which doesn't meet the 25% standard. About 400,000 people get both.

25 posted on 11/03/2003 9:30:05 PM PST by DmBarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SouthCarolinaKit
It must be the advertising revenue that's down for the NYTIMES. . . 5%. I can not believe that this error-filled rag has increased it's circulation but then, it's bought by the same people who elected Schumer and Hillary.

The New York Times circulation is NOT up. First of all, keep in mind that a 0.5% increase in circulation is practically statistical noise. Second, and far more importantly, note that these numbers are compared to the same period a year ago, not the prior six months. On March 30, their circulation was 1,130,740. That means that in the last six months, the Times's circulation has DROPPED 1.1 percent.

26 posted on 11/03/2003 9:50:35 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
"HmmmMmMmMmmMmMMMMmmmmm...."

See post 26, Stroking-Chin Boy. Their circulation is actually DOWN 1.1% since the Iraq/Jayson Blair scandals hit.

27 posted on 11/03/2003 9:53:23 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: eddie willers
I think it is legit to include the WSJ online subscriptions as, unlike the other fishwraps, you really do have to pay to get their paper.

Their version is just another means of distribution.

I would agree. I'm an on-line subscriber because I hate dealing with used newspapers. If there's an article I want to keep, I save it to my hard drive. There it's filed and indexed so I can find it again, unlike my husband's four crates of 20 year old clippings.

29 posted on 11/04/2003 9:53:30 AM PST by reformed_democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson