Skip to comments.
Circulation of the Nation's 20 Biggest Newspapers.
AP ^
| 11/03/03
| AP
Posted on 11/03/2003 5:42:14 PM PST by Pikamax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...
This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.
21
posted on
11/03/2003 9:01:13 PM PST
by
Timesink
To: jocon307
We are densley populated, and we love our papers, we used to have bunches more! How to spot the fake New Yorker: Have them pronounce "Staten Island Advance".
22
posted on
11/03/2003 9:03:36 PM PST
by
Timesink
To: Rightone
WSJ nearly twice the circulation of the NY Times and the LA Times. Didn't know that and that is GOOD news.As the WSJ likes to say itself, they're about the only paper in the county that a lot of people subscribe to just for the editorial page.
23
posted on
11/03/2003 9:16:52 PM PST
by
Timesink
To: Timesink
The New York Times, 1,118,565, up 0.5 percent "HmmmMmMmMmmMmMMMMmmmmm...."
24
posted on
11/03/2003 9:28:56 PM PST
by
martin_fierro
(_____oooo_( ° ¿ ° )_oooo_____)
To: eddie willers
I think it is legit to include the WSJ online subscriptions as, unlike the other fishwraps, you really do have to pay to get their paper. There version is just another means of distribution. To qualify the on-line suscription must be at least 25% of the cost of the print paper. If you don't get the print paper, the on-line is $79/yr. If you get the paper, it is $39, which doesn't meet the 25% standard. About 400,000 people get both.
25
posted on
11/03/2003 9:30:05 PM PST
by
DmBarch
To: SouthCarolinaKit
It must be the advertising revenue that's down for the NYTIMES. . . 5%. I can not believe that this error-filled rag has increased it's circulation but then, it's bought by the same people who elected Schumer and Hillary. The New York Times circulation is NOT up. First of all, keep in mind that a 0.5% increase in circulation is practically statistical noise. Second, and far more importantly, note that these numbers are compared to the same period a year ago, not the prior six months. On March 30, their circulation was 1,130,740. That means that in the last six months, the Times's circulation has DROPPED 1.1 percent.
26
posted on
11/03/2003 9:50:35 PM PST
by
Timesink
To: martin_fierro
"HmmmMmMmMmmMmMMMMmmmmm...."See post 26, Stroking-Chin Boy. Their circulation is actually DOWN 1.1% since the Iraq/Jayson Blair scandals hit.
27
posted on
11/03/2003 9:53:23 PM PST
by
Timesink
Comment #28 Removed by Moderator
To: eddie willers
I think it is legit to include the WSJ online subscriptions as, unlike the other fishwraps, you really do have to pay to get their paper. Their version is just another means of distribution.
I would agree. I'm an on-line subscriber because I hate dealing with used newspapers. If there's an article I want to keep, I save it to my hard drive. There it's filed and indexed so I can find it again, unlike my husband's four crates of 20 year old clippings.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson