Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TAKE ACTION TODAY -- President Bush Signs Partial Birth Abortion -- NE Judge Puts a Stay on Bill
5 Nov 2003 | PhiKapMom

Posted on 11/05/2003 12:06:41 PM PST by PhiKapMom

The President signed the Partial Birth Abortion bill today and within an hour, a Nebraska Federal Judge according to Fox News had put a stay on the Partial Birth Abortion bill taking effect. ACLU is also shopping for a Manhatten Federal Judge to do the same.

Since these liberal judges have taken this action, it is up to Freepers to take action. Please start writing letters and calling talk radio NOW. You can find the info for your area by visiting Bush-Cheney '04 at:

Bush-Cheney '04 Activism Site

Please post on this thread the action you have taken and notify all your email lists to also take action. Time for all of us not to take it anymore from these Federal judges.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: abortion; birth; federaljudge; partial; pbaban2003; stay; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
Enough is enough from these Federal Judges. Write/Call TODAY!
1 posted on 11/05/2003 12:06:41 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing; onyx; JohnHuang2; Dog Gone; Dog; isthisnickcool; OKSooner; VOA; mhking; Reagan Man; ...
To read President Bush's comments before signing the Partial Birth Abortion Ban, please visit the daily Victory thread at:

363 Days to Victory '04 -- President Bush's Remarks on Signing of Partial Birth Abortion Ban


2 posted on 11/05/2003 12:11:34 PM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Don't forget to Visit/donate at http://www.georgewbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom; deport
Any info handy on this jack-ass? Such as, which democrat president appointed him, his fax number, e-mail address, etc?

Yo, deport! You're thee best.......
3 posted on 11/05/2003 12:11:41 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I love how the judge was saying he'd block it even before Bush signed the bill. Nice judicial ethics there.
4 posted on 11/05/2003 12:17:47 PM PST by jmcclain19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
We are a representitive republic. We vote for representitives to speak for us. They have spoken for us.

If the courts choose to over ride the will of the people, then the representitives are not representing us by leaving these judges in place. If our representitives were to truely do their job, they'd impeach these judges for abuse of power

There's no taxation without representation. If the government doesn't represent us, we no longer need to pay taxes. If the courts decide our laws, we have no representation. That means no taxes.

5 posted on 11/05/2003 12:22:39 PM PST by concerned about politics ( As a rightous man declarith a thing, so shall it be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmcclain19

As in the Terri case, the pro-death crowd shopped around for a pro-death judge - Murder Inc. They found this one. This one is willing to dictate from the bench (facist litigation) to go around the representitive republic and the will of the people.

6 posted on 11/05/2003 12:26:10 PM PST by concerned about politics ( As a rightous man declarith a thing, so shall it be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Planned Parenthood just sent a email to their minions...urging them to email Bush and BLAST HIM for signing the (as they put it) "so-called" Partial Birth Abortion Ban.......

Click HERE to THANK HIM for stopping this barbaric form of infanticide.

7 posted on 11/05/2003 12:39:10 PM PST by Gopher Broke (Abortion: Big people killing little people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
I agree totally that this law should be in effect BUT AND ONLY BUT....

If it is true in instances in which the mother's life is in danger then that should be included in the bill.

AND ONLY THAT nothing more. If a stay has to be put on this bill to allow that exemption then I am ok with that. I love my wife and if it were her life and that of a child I am sorry I wpuld have to opt for the life of my wife.
8 posted on 11/05/2003 12:40:49 PM PST by AbsoluteJustice (Kiss me I'm an INFIDEL!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Impeach this
9 posted on 11/05/2003 12:46:01 PM PST by keithtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AbsoluteJustice
AND ONLY THAT nothing more. If a stay has to be put on this bill to allow that exemption then I am ok with that. I love my wife and if it were her life and that of a child I am sorry I wpuld have to opt for the life of my wife.

There is never any medical or health reason to briefly pause childbirth long enough to kill the baby before he or she is fully birthed. In fact, birthing the feet first (as is done with the D&X procedure) is more dangerous to the mother than birthing head first. If you can deliver the child's legs and torso, there's no reason to not deliver the head - unless of course you intend the sneak into the legal window that allows you to murder the baby inches before full birth.

10 posted on 11/05/2003 12:46:50 PM PST by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: keithtoo
The judge's name is Richard Kopf.

Richard = Dick
Kopf = German for head.

So, this judge will hereafter be known as Judge Dick Head.

11 posted on 11/05/2003 12:47:51 PM PST by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AbsoluteJustice
AND ONLY THAT nothing more. If a stay has to be put on this bill to allow that exemption then I am ok with that. I love my wife and if it were her life and that of a child I am sorry I wpuld have to opt for the life of my wife.

It's in there. The last time they signed this bill, it wasn't there. That's how the pro-death killers got it thrown out.
They didn't want to make that err again.

12 posted on 11/05/2003 12:48:56 PM PST by concerned about politics ( As a rightous man declarith a thing, so shall it be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
There are instances, few of course, but there are instances in which women have been told by medical doctors that having birth CAN be deadly. I am no doctor and these instances are long before the partial birth abortion debate even began. None of what you list below are in those circumstances and anyone with half a brain knows this. I am sure there are rare diseases or conditions in which a soon to be mother's life may be in danger if she were to give birth. I AM NOT FOR ABORTION but if my wife were told by a medical doctor NOT A BUTCHER DOCTOR that her life may end if she were to give birth, I am sorry but my wife lives and child goes. I have a child so I know how I would feel FYI.
13 posted on 11/05/2003 12:53:18 PM PST by AbsoluteJustice (Kiss me I'm an INFIDEL!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AbsoluteJustice
But in the D&X procedure (partial birth abortion) the mother gives partial birth and the baby's head is held in the birth canal just long enough to suck the brains out and crush the skull. Give a slight pull, or let natural contractions complete the work - as in don't mess with the childbirth already in progress - and the child would be born alive. They only perform the procedure to fit within some grisly legal window allowing the murder of the child at a VERY late stage of pregnancy.

Another method to kill the child at this stage is to perform a partial C Section - enough to allow access to the child - and to clamp the umbilical and let the child suffocate within the mother's womb before it is removed. Again, no excuse but technically legal. No, the C Section method is not performed in an abortuary, but has been reported to have been done in some hospitals (I've read a lot of pro-life books containing testimony from ex-abortionists and nurses.)

14 posted on 11/05/2003 1:01:42 PM PST by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Is there another method that this can be done IF AND ONLY IF the mother's life is determined to be in danger NOT when the child is coming out? Because these conditions had to have been diagnosed prior to the mother giving birth.
15 posted on 11/05/2003 1:09:31 PM PST by AbsoluteJustice (Kiss me I'm an INFIDEL!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AbsoluteJustice
Is there another method that this can be done IF AND ONLY IF the mother's life is determined to be in danger NOT when the child is coming out? Because these conditions had to have been diagnosed prior to the mother giving birth.

Yes, either complete the childbirth since you've already endangered the mother as much or more through the partial birth. Or deliver via emergency C Section. There's no medical reason to KILL the child in the process.

16 posted on 11/05/2003 1:18:26 PM PST by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AbsoluteJustice
Correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn't a woman who knows that getting pregnant would result in her death do something about it BEFORE she gets pregnant....my doctor told me that after my fourth child ...so....guess what...we had that issued settled before I left his office that day, or at least my husband did....the cases of women having this procedure performed due to health concerns is infinitisimal....by the way, health concerns can be severe depression or anxiety, so for that a little baby deserves this horrific procedure? I don't think so.
17 posted on 11/05/2003 1:27:04 PM PST by coloradomomba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
The judge is suffering from delusions of grandeur.He has NO AUTHORITY to stay anything.Congress passes laws and the da*n judges have no right to usurp them.The president should order the executive branch to carry out the enforcement and spit on the courts!
18 posted on 11/05/2003 1:45:17 PM PST by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
"Such as, which democrat president appointed him"

He was appointed by GHWB, not a Democrat.
19 posted on 11/05/2003 1:47:26 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

20 posted on 11/05/2003 2:00:54 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson