Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Issues Abortion Law Injunction
FNC ^ | Wednesday, November 05, 2003

Posted on 11/05/2003 12:30:25 PM PST by Kaslin

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:37:42 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: Kaslin
http://www.arktimes.com/white87.htm

A Whitewater Judge that voted to keep Hillary Clinton's notes private.
41 posted on 11/05/2003 1:05:10 PM PST by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Shouldn't this judge recuse himself as he provided his likely opinion before the actual complaint was received?

Doh! That would require he have some ethics.

Nevermind.
42 posted on 11/05/2003 1:06:29 PM PST by highlander_UW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Kopf, Richard George
Born 1946 in Toledo, OH

Federal Judicial Service:
U. S. District Court, District of Nebraska
Nominated by George H.W. Bush on April 7, 1992, to a seat vacated by Warren K. Urbom; Confirmed by the Senate on May 21, 1992, and received commission on May 26, 1992. Served as chief judge, 1999-present.

Education:
Kearney State College (now University of Nebraska at Kearney), B.A., 1969

University of Nebraska College of Law, J.D., 1972

Professional Career:
Law clerk, Hon. Donald Ross, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, 1972-1974
Private practice, Lexington, Nebraska, 1974-1986
Counsel for the State of Nebraska in regard to the impeachment of the state attorney general of Nebraska, 1984
U.S. Magistrate, U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska, 1987-1992

Race or Ethnicity: White

Gender: Male
43 posted on 11/05/2003 1:08:21 PM PST by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckca
I defy ANYONE to name circumstances in which the life or health of the mother is at stake whereby a risky 2 to 3 day procedure is safer than a simple stat C-section!!!

I think there was a long signed letter or ad signed by lots of doctors a couple of years ago, explaining that PBA does not have a name "acceptable" to pro-aborts because it is not and never was a valid medical procedure. It may also have gone into the risk of inadvertently slicing the mother because the doctor's working sort of blind.

I think I saw the letter/ad in the WSJ, but it may have appeared other places.

44 posted on 11/05/2003 1:08:56 PM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
This is outragious

Its also hugh and series.

45 posted on 11/05/2003 1:09:17 PM PST by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I can only hope that AG Ashcroft, in defending this law, will find a way to bring into evidence video footage of this procedure. I want these clowns on record defending this procedure as the public has access to how atrocious this really is.
46 posted on 11/05/2003 1:09:42 PM PST by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
I would still like to know how killing the baby protects the health of the mother.

health=Mental Health

47 posted on 11/05/2003 1:10:28 PM PST by m1-lightning (If Al Queda chose a party to vote for, it would be the Libertarinans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hacksaw
My guess is the few who murder babies for money in this way are ashamed to show their faces in public.
48 posted on 11/05/2003 1:11:12 PM PST by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GeekDejure
Judge Dick Head needs his brains sucked out.
49 posted on 11/05/2003 1:16:26 PM PST by m1-lightning (If Al Queda chose a party to vote for, it would be the Libertarinans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: freeangel; All
I'm curious -- what would the response be here if I were to post pictures of the partial birth abortion? Maybe better what would be the response to posting it at dummyland?
50 posted on 11/05/2003 1:16:47 PM PST by Naspino (I am in no way associated with the views expressed in your posts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Of course it is. It's never a judge's prerogative to question the reasoning of Congress or the adequacy of its research. That's exactly what this judge is doing, despite the fact that he is only supposed to rule on the constitutionality of the law.

Still, it won't surprise me if the 6 clowns we have on our USSC rule that European law supports the right to murder an infant.

51 posted on 11/05/2003 1:19:06 PM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
posting it here would be preaching to the choir. I've seen the photos and don't need to see them again. Posting them to dummyland would just likely get the post and your acct deleted. (though i doubt that matters so go ahead :) but we don't need it here)
52 posted on 11/05/2003 1:20:25 PM PST by honeygrl (Surgeon General's Warning: This FReeper hasn't slept through the night in over a year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
Arg... they need to be shown on television every night.
53 posted on 11/05/2003 1:21:41 PM PST by Naspino (I am in no way associated with the views expressed in your posts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian; Spiff
The U.S. Supreme Court struck down prior PBA bans as unconstitutional by a 5-4 vote, about two years ago.

here is a link to the Supreme Court's decision striking down a prior PBA ban.

54 posted on 11/05/2003 1:22:05 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
Too late, already done and replace with sh!t.
55 posted on 11/05/2003 1:22:48 PM PST by 11Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
A perfect illustration of why we need judges confirmed.
What is up with the lust for death crowd?
56 posted on 11/05/2003 1:25:31 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckca
I think there was a long signed letter or ad signed by lots of doctors a couple of years ago, explaining that PBA does not have a name "acceptable" to pro-aborts because it is not and never was a valid medical procedure.

I found one from 1997 that looks like it. The link is to a .pdf file. Physicians Ad Hoc Coalition for Truth

57 posted on 11/05/2003 1:27:55 PM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung
"Nominated by George H.W. Bush"

Hmm.....
58 posted on 11/05/2003 1:43:12 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
>>>>>I always thought you had to have a hearing before issuing an injunction. But what do I know? I'm just an attorney.

Well, I thought you had to have a law before you could have a lawsuit. How on earth did they get this thing before this judge this fast, unless they filed the lawsuit before Bush even signed the law, much less it took effect. Given that he issued this TRO less than an hour after Bush signed the law, I don't see how a lawsuit could have been filed and the attorneys halled before the court, had a three hour hearing, etc., and issue this in less than one hour.

Since when is an issue ripe for consideration before the law is even signed?

Unless I'm missing something, in any other area of law this lawsuit would have been booted, not heard. But he, I'm also just an attorney, not a baby killing judge.

patent
59 posted on 11/05/2003 1:43:21 PM PST by patent (A baby is God's opinion that life should go on. Carl Sandburg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
This country is a banana republic.
60 posted on 11/05/2003 1:45:27 PM PST by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson