[Devil_Anse]

Yeah, isn't that bit about worrying about boat motor exhaust--isn't that just the most OJ-esque thing you've ever heard? JUST like OJ pumping his ex-cop friend for info on how lie detectors work, then telling the friend, in essence, that if he took a lie detector test it might falsely read as "guilty" because OJ said he'd had "dreams" of killing Nicole.

Furthermore, the friend, when he testified, said he'd heard people on the hot seat equivocate in exactly that same way about lie detector "false" results--and those people had turned out to be guilty.

[Yaelle]

Oh, absolutely. Scott's response was CLEARLY because he had shot the gun. If he knew he had no residue, he would not have said it. I betcha they got some from him.

Without the head, though, they will never know cause of death. However, there is so much circumstantial evidence here. Once the jury sees the two stories; the one that Scott says happened and the one the evidence points to, he will be convicted. That's what I think from this perspective. I am surprised that some of us here think he will be acquitted. The O.J. jury will NOT be a part of this.

We need to have women and family men on that jury. We need to minimize sleazy cheats and single guys, because their own personal guilt will have them saying "So he cheats! That doesn't make him a murderer!" A couple of pregnant women would be GREAT, though they could NOT sit through that testimony and the profuse vomiting and crying would get them excused. But they'd hang him quick.