Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: friendly
No, the NYT may be willing to purge Duranty in exchange for a clean bill in all other matters. But, this should not be the case. While Duranty was blatant in his support of the anti-American communists, from 1932 to 1972 the NYT was harbouring communists and published as gospel the extensions of Duranty's mendacity. Today, they print and advocate the anti-American lies of the neocommunists. Concoct some political correct story that can be spun to implicate President Bush, and it will make the NYT front and editorial pages for a week.
7 posted on 11/09/2003 11:27:24 AM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Tacis
While Duranty was blatant in his support of the anti-American communists, from 1932 to 1972 the NYT was harbouring communists and published as gospel the extensions of Duranty's mendacity. Today, they print and advocate the anti-American lies of the neocommunists. Concoct some political correct story that can be spun to implicate President Bush, and it will make the NYT front and editorial pages for a week.

The Old Red Lady!

8 posted on 11/09/2003 11:29:59 AM PST by friendly (Man is so made that whenever anything fires his soul, impossibilities vanish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson