Posted on 11/09/2003 7:06:13 PM PST by Pikamax
Maybe the story also involved not judging by outward appearances (ie:those all dressed up and talking church may not be what they appear)but rather what was in people's hearts regardless of religion,race,colour etc etc.The one who did was trully his neighbour,not the one's who simply talked.Much like some who lecture as opposed to some who "...that brings Christmas joy, packed in gift-filled shoeboxes, to children around the world". Over the past 10 years, 24 million shoeboxes have been delivered, making it the world's largest children's Christmas project. Every US president since Ronald Reagan has packed a shoebox for Operation Christmas Child..." etc etc.
Conclusion:yes "we must overcome religious bigotry" The question is who exactly is the religious bigot?
"We must get over our fondness for charity and develop a thirst for justice."
Ideally...wouldn't true justice actually be born of charity?
"What is astonishing is that Christian fundamentalists have managed to persuade millions that their warped version of Christianity is the real thing and that mainstream churches have sold out to the secular spirit of the age. The truth is quite the reverse."
We shall see.
To put it in perspective, suppose Christians of my particular sect were persecuted and in an incredible act of generosity, Saudi Arabia allowed us to move over there, practice our religion and customs, and even get jobs without being discriminated against. I would be a poor guest and maybe even crazy if I was "offended" that most of the people over there were Muslims and there were Muslim rather than Christian holidays, etc.
I would just be grateful that they gave me sanctuary and I would not expect every Muslim I met to go out of his way to make me feel comfortable. I would respect the fact that they were going our of their way just to give me sanctuary and I would not demand that everyone like me. I would expect that people from different cultures would not always be comfortable with one another and I would not be devastated if someone did not "understand" me. I would not demand that every Muslim accept the doctrine of the Trinity just to make me feel comfortable and important.
Now, according to the article, there are Muslims in the UK who are "offended" that there is Christian literature and there are Christian symbols in a country that has been mostly Christian for over 1,000 years. Were they surprised and expecting perhaps Buddhist symbols? I don't understand. The last I knew, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, and even Christains were free to give out literature and teach their religion. If someone finds it offensive that people can freely express their views, perhaps he is intolerant and should leave to find a less open country. And I really don't know what to think of so-called Christians who are upset that anyone is preaching Christianity.
This fake "reverend" is over the top. Imagine a real Christian denigrating charity!
And I bet his definition of "justice" is pretty interesting. Wanna know how to get people to succinctly divulge their political philosophy? Ask them for an open-ended definition of "justice."
If any of you are interested in participating in the Operation Christmas Child Project, shoebox collection week is Nov 17-24.
Yeah.
I guess offering people hope, and a chance to enjoy true freedom on earth and to escape eternal torment in hell is poison, eh?
The bullshit before the but
The problem isn't simply the nine bishops - the Church of England itself is institutionally homophobic
Giles Fraser
Friday June 20, 2003
The Guardian
Everything before the but is bullshit. It's a useful hermeneutic rule when dealing with sentences of the type: "I'm not racist, but..." It's just as applicable to the official position of the Church of England concerning homosexuality: "We're not homophobic, but..." I'm not allowed to accuse others in the church of homophobia, for it is one of the conditions of dialogue between people with "different views" that we respect each other's viewpoint and don't call each other names. But if it looks like a dog and barks like a dog, by golly it is a dog. The Church of England is institutionally homophobic.
The Samaritans follow a Mosaic faith that developed seperately from Judaism for 2500 years. They are not idolitors.
Jesus said (Matthew 28:19-20) "Go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you."
I hate when the religious left "lectures" us on "legitimate" Christianity. They strain at a gnat and swallow a camel (sexual perversion).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.