Posted on 11/10/2003 3:19:15 PM PST by RatherBiased.com
By Alexandra Trustman
I'm writing in response to thE Daily Jolt forums, the student dialogue and The Herald representation of me and my question at CNN's Rock the Vote. I'm extremely disappointed in the student body's reaction, especially because they weren't privy to the circumstances under which I had to ask the question, a situation that occurs daily in the media. To clear things up, I was called the morning of the event and asked by the executive producer of the show if I would ask a question at the forum. I was told the question would probably be something about Macs or PCs, but that, once I arrived in Boston, we could amend what I would ask. Immediately, confused by the question's relevance as well, I tried to think about ways to make it seem applicable. I thought perhaps CNN's aim in wanting the candidates to answer their computer preference was really a way to breach the topic of technology. So, I constructed a much more relevant question, about how, if elected, the candidates would use technology in their administrations. Once in Boston I was handed a note card with the Macs or PCs version of Clinton's boxers or briefs question. After reading it, I told the executive producer that I didn't see the question's relevance and had thought of one that I would like to ask instead. He took a look at my question and told me I couldn't ask it because it wasn't light−hearted enough and they wanted to modulate the event with various types of questions — mine was to be one of the questions on the less serious side. The show's host wanted the Macs or PCs question asked, not because he was wondering about the candidates' views of technology, but because he thought it would be a good opportunity for the candidates to relate to a younger audience — hence the 18− to 31−year−old audience of Rock the Vote. At this point it was clear to me that the question would be asked regardless of whether I was the person to ask it. I had to make the decision whether to actively participate in Rock the Vote by asking a question that wasn't mine and wasn't representative of me as a Brown student, or to sit in the stands uninvolved. The executive producer had asked and wanted me to pose the question, so being someone who doesn't like to go back on her word, as a favor to him I went ahead, hoping that if CNN wanted the question asked there must be a reason. Loyalty to my commitment and the opportunity to be involved in Rock the Vote outweighed any criticism I thought would come from the question. Granted, I wish I had been able to ask something else, but when put into perspective, there are many questions I could have asked that would have yielded a much more negative response. It's not as if what I said was inappropriate or politically incorrect. As the New York Times put it, Rock the Vote was "intended by its organizers to offer a somewhat offbeat view of the candidates by having them answer questions from young voters. And there were, indeed, the offbeat questions, like whether the candidates … preferred PCs to Macs." It's unfortunate that the candidates were unable to take advantage of the question to try to relate to the young viewers by extrapolating their answers. In effect they missed the opportunity to reveal an aspect of their offbeat, youthful side.
Those who criticized the question didn't take into account why CNN might have wanted it asked — what's more, they didn't hesitate to judge me for asking a question I couldn't change. I would have hoped that such a liberal student body, from a school that in the very school catalog advocates intellectual freedom, would have reserved judgment on a situation and person it knew little if nothing about. Not one person bothered to inquire or find out the truth about the incident. No one even asked me to write this opinions column. My side was left completely unrepresented and was as a consequence misrepresented. At a school where we pride ourselves on open mindedness and good journalism, I would have expected that before being criticized, both sides of the story would be presented, if not for the professionalism of the Brown Daily Herald, then perhaps for the respect of a fellow student.
I would have hoped that such a liberal student body, from a school that in the very school catalog advocates intellectual freedom, would have reserved judgment on a situation and person it knew little if nothing about.
She "pretended" it was her question, now she's upset that people believed what she said.
Then proceed with the question.....but nooooo....thereby giving away the "game."
These Town Hall meetings/debates have long been a crock of dung...I remember one such Dole/Clinton '96 "debate" [gag] that was advertised as being given before a San Diego audience who "are ALL neutral and have not made up their minds." One of the "gee, I just can't decide" "questioners" tossed a real softball at clinnochio. San Diegans who followed politics knew it was the SISTER of an ex-Demo San Diego Mayor (Maureen O'Conner). Suuurrrree she hadn't "made up her mind." At that debate NOT ONE person asked clinnochio about the dirty hands chinese money he had been recieving NOT ONE...bastards all....
I NEVER watch these so-called "debates" anymore. They're all softballs and "Gotchas" depending on how the media wants it to go:
"Mr. Bush, who is the #4 man in Ugudabugadah Land?" Then when he "doesn't know!!!" he's "stupid."
Then they turn around and say:
"Mr. Demo, If you could have another 10 days of the year to help crippled children, would you do it?" then demo says "Yes" and "he cares, he's sensitive, he feels our 'pain' "[he's also full of $&!+ but that is beside the point]
Poor Bush #1---frankly while it didn't score "he feels about our pain and 'cares' about it" Bush looking at his watch to see how much longer he would have to put up with that crap showed a REAL sign of genuine intelligence, no matter how the media spun it.
I bet she really did want to ask the "boxers or briefs" question but would Carole Mosley Braun have answered?
PC: Dean, Kucinich, and Moseley-Braun (but her son has a Mac)
PDA: Lieberman
and, drum-roll please ...
Mac: Sharpton
(courtesy of The Mac Observer)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.