Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grania
I think he raises good points. Problems are he peppers it with some exaggerations, deflective lefty buzz phrases ("stifling dissent") and demo obsessions ("Karl Rove")

The speech had promise, but I think he lost it.

5 posted on 11/10/2003 8:44:05 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Shermy
I think he raises good points. Problems are he peppers it with some exaggerations, deflective lefty buzz phrases ("stifling dissent") and demo obsessions ("Karl Rove") The speech had promise, but I think he lost it.

That's where I was. The PatriotAct might have been necessary for immediate steps after 911, but an awful lot of what's in it shouldn't be permanent. We'd be in tough shape if the wrong group came to power and misused it.

Some of the other points about how 911 could've been prevented if checks in place were being utilized are the kind of thing that would be good to know more about.

But then, he rambles. He kind of loses his good points when he goes on for too long and mixes the scare stuff with the real concerns.

9 posted on 11/11/2003 4:06:10 AM PST by grania ("Won't get fooled again")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson