Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sandlady; nmh
"BTW You read the part from this thread that says they're not even sure it's her, right?"

Well, of course not, that might interfere with jumping to conclusions. It might also make sense. Can't have that.

"the explicit photographs cannot be positively identified as being those of Jessica"

280 posted on 11/11/2003 2:31:01 AM PST by milemark (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]


To: nmh; sandlady
This is what happens when you jump to conclusions based on the word of a creature like Larry Flynt, nmh. You get spun. Flynt now says he just bought the pics to keep them from ever being published. Can you say "publicity stunt?"

"I was offered photos of Jessica Lynch. I purchased them in order to keep them out of circulation, not to publish them," Flynt, publisher of Hustler magazine, said in a statement read by a publicist.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102736,00.html

290 posted on 11/11/2003 3:45:46 AM PST by milemark (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies ]

To: milemark
"Well, of course not, that might interfere with jumping to conclusions. It might also make sense. Can't have that."

Nice try. You'd probably still defend her if they video taped her doing the town with that all American smile on her face.

307 posted on 11/11/2003 7:24:05 AM PST by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson