Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alter Kaker; Squantos; wardaddy
I think the 450kg is as powerfull or more than the OKC bomb. The detonation rate of anfo is inferior to that of munitions explosive. I do not know for sure, this is why I flag'd the others...
16 posted on 11/11/2003 1:48:13 PM PST by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: sit-rep
I think the 450kg is as powerfull or more than the OKC bomb

I look over journals and estimates here which put your "OKC" bomb at equivalent of 1800 kg high explosive.

17 posted on 11/11/2003 1:50:39 PM PST by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: sit-rep
"The detonation rate of anfo is inferior to that of munitions explosive."

Actually, Ammonium Nitrate explosive, which has a very slow rate of detonation (approx. 9000 fps), is superior to higher velocity explosives in certain applications. That's why it is used almost exclusively for cratering and often used for destroying bunkers and buildings.

High explosive, such as C-4 (approx. 26,000 fps), is much more effective in cutting and breaching, but lb. for lb., does not have near the tremendous pushing effect that a slower explosives has.

Whether inferior or superior all depends on the application intended, however, when improvising as the Iraqis have been doing, they are more than likely just using what is readily available.

32 posted on 11/11/2003 3:08:02 PM PST by theirjustdue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson