Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The General's Fading Star: Wesley Clark's deflating candidacy. (repost)
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | Wednesday, November 12, 2003 | By Dick Morris

Posted on 11/12/2003 1:52:23 AM PST by JohnHuang2

The General's Fading Star
By Dick Morris
FrontPageMagazine.com | November 12, 2003


Old soldiers who run for president, to paraphrase MacArthur, never die, they just fade away. Wesley Clark has just faded.

The latest Marist Poll taken at the end of October shows the former general fading from a tie for first place to fifth in the Democratic primary field, dropping to 8 percent of the Democratic vote nationwide, well behind Howard Dean who led at 16 percent of the likely Democratic primary voters.

Other recent polls confirm the same trend. The ABC/Washington Post poll last week shows Clark fading to fourth place and the Fox News/Opinion Dynamics poll records a drop in his favorable/unfavor- able ratio from 24-11 at the end of September to 25-19 at the end of October.

Since Clark is not running in Iowa (Jan. 19) and likely not in New Hampshire (Jan. 27) either, he had to keep his national standing intact to have any hope of entering the process on Feb. 3, when five states (Arizona, Delaware, Missouri, Oklahoma and South Carolina) have their primaries.

Clark would need to do very well on that day and in the rest of February, as Tennessee, Virginia and Utah hold their primaries - because on March 2 it will be all over. That's when New York, California, Texas and Ohio all vote.

This is too steep a hill for Clark to climb with fading popularity, limited financial resources and no early primary victories for momentum.

Clark's slips, reversals, disavowals and denials have begun to catch up with him. The war? He first said that he would have voted for it, then flipped to say he would have voted no.

Political party? He's a Democrat, but he backed Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan and didn't fully decide on his party until right before he entered the race. Bosnia? What was he doing posing with a Serbian war criminal swapping hats like old buddies? A face, a rank and a former uniform are not enough to make up a presidential candidate.

In September and October, the ultimate media candidate - Clark - competed for national attention with the leading grass-roots (cyber roots) candidate - Dean. Each had his face on the cover of Time and Newsweek.

But media coverage was all that Clark had, while Dean had amassed a solid base of 500,000 online supporters and 285,000 campaign donors (most campaigns are lucky if they get 10,000 contributors this early).

Instead, Clark had the Clintons. Not officially, not formally, but everyone knew that where Bruce Lindsay was and the Clinton campaign operatives were, Bill was not far behind.

The massive mobilization of gay activists and peaceniks impelled a surge in Dean's candidacy that has continued while Clark's boom faded.

Now there is precious little to stand between Dean and his nomination. All depends on Iowa. If Dean defeats Gephardt in the Missouri congressman's back yard, the momentum will sweep him to victory in New Hampshire. Having won the first two states, with Clark gone from serious contention, there will be nothing to stop him from sweeping the front-loaded nominating process.

The delicious irony is that the primary process is front-loaded precisely to keep the Howard Deans of the world out. The Democratic bosses figured that with the big states voting so early in the nominating process that a candidate could not come from out of nowhere, jump start with a win in Iowa or New Hampshire and then build the momentum to win the big states. He just couldn't get the money together in time. The process was set up to advantage a Gephardt or Kerry or Lieberman.

It didn't work that way. Dean raised the funds he needed online before the first primary happened. Before New Hampshire or Iowa, he won the activist primary through the internet - and that made all the difference.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; clark; dickmorris; wesleyclark
Wednesday, November 12, 2003

Quote of the Day by Interesting Times

1 posted on 11/12/2003 1:52:23 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

I wonder if Wes has a Confederate flag on his pickup?
2 posted on 11/12/2003 2:43:44 AM PST by semiarticulate (SPRAWL= when the suburbs vote DEMOCRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Just so all hands are aware: The Army Navy Times/Marine Corps Times/etc., etc. - all Gannett publications, and all aimed at serving and former military personnel,and their families, have been:

1. Doing their level best to demoralize service families,by sensationalizing every proposed change in benefits ;
2. Quietly promoting the candidacy of Wesley Clark;
3. Openly encouraging an anti-administration outlook:
4. Promoting widespread resentment and discontent.

3 posted on 11/12/2003 4:26:31 AM PST by genefromjersey (So little time - so many FLAMES to light !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson