Skip to comments.
Senate votes for sanctions against Syria
Washington Times ^
| Wednesday, November 12, 2003
| By Stephen Dinan
Posted on 11/12/2003 2:19:27 AM PST by JohnHuang2
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:10:14 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The Senate voted yesterday to punish Syria through economic and trade sanctions until Damascus expels terrorist groups, withdraws its troops from Lebanon and ends its nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs.
The bill, which passed by a vote of 89-4, gives President Bush broad authority to waive the sanctions if he deems it necessary, but lawmakers said it still sends a message that Syria must switch sides in the war on terror.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: syria
To: Cincinatus' Wife; ALOHA RONNIE
No retreat!
2
posted on
11/12/2003 2:22:53 AM PST
by
risk
(NEVER FORGET)
To: JohnHuang2; risk
Voting against the bill were Sen. Robert C. Byrd, West Virginia Democrat, Sen. Michael B. Enzi, Wyoming Republican, Sen. Lincoln Chafee, Rhode Island Republican, and Sen. James M. Jeffords, Vermont independent. Bump!
To: Cincinatus' Wife
What a surprise, eh?
G'morning to ya, Cincy
To: JohnHuang2
Hi there JohnHuang2!
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Enzi voted against? What's his problem?
Syria needs some GPS targeted bombs on the President's houses and government structures.
I'd nuke the Becca valley in Lebanon. No one would notice and no one would care but the terrorist. A small megaton device can do the job and the radiation would be almost non-existent.
Oops, there I go again talking about ideas that free people are allowed to do in our country. But I guess I'll get put on the Andrew Sullivan, Sean Hannity, and critics on FR list as a "nuke Mecca" member.
Oh well! ;-)
6
posted on
11/12/2003 2:29:11 AM PST
by
Fledermaus
(I'm a conservative...not necessarily a Republican.)
To: Fledermaus
I say, follow the money. There must be a link.
To: JohnHuang2
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1019770/posts SYRIA COMPLETES CHEMICAL WEAPON WARHEADS [for its scud-based missiles]
MENL ^ | 11/11/2003
Posted on 11/11/2003 9:13 PM PST by yonif
"DAMASCUS [MENL] -- Syria has completed chemical warheads for its arsenal of Scud-based missiles.
U.S. officials said Syria, with help from North Korea, has succeeded in designing and installing CW warheads for the Scud B, Scud C and Scud D missiles. This provides Syria with warheads that can reach distances from 250 to nearly 700 kilometers.
The chemical agent deployed in the CW warheads is sarin, regarded as the most toxic of material. Syria has also been developing more toxic agents such as VX.
"Since the 1970s, Syria has pursued what is now one of the most advanced Arab state chemical weapons capabilities," Undersecretary of State John Bolton said on Oct. 30. "It has a stockpile of the nerve agent sarin that can be delivered by aircraft or ballistic missiles, and has engaged in the research and development of more toxic and persistent nerve agents such as VX.""
8
posted on
11/12/2003 2:54:31 AM PST
by
Cindy
To: JohnHuang2
Voting against the bill were [...] For the system to be perfect every voting should be unanimous, 89-4 is not good enough. Dissenting votes should not be tolerated!
9
posted on
11/12/2003 7:12:19 PM PST
by
A. Pole
To: Fledermaus
Why nuke, now that the MOAB is operational?
10
posted on
11/12/2003 7:47:28 PM PST
by
sarasmom
To: sarasmom
The MOAB does make a nice mushroom cloud. But I want the low level radiation...these moronic Arabs are very superstitious and they'd be afraid to enter into the area for fear of being radiated.
11
posted on
11/12/2003 11:03:56 PM PST
by
Fledermaus
(I'm a conservative...not necessarily a Republican.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson