Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A tale of two memos: Hugh Hewitt exposes Democrats' lack of concern for U.S. security
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, November 12, 2003 | Hugh Hewitt

Posted on 11/12/2003 2:32:41 AM PST by JohnHuang2

A tale of two memos

Posted: November 12, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

The tale of two memos illustrates much that divides Republicans from Democrats.

The first memo was authored by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. It was leaked from the Pentagon, and it was characterized by its focus on the enemy that threatens the United States. Rumsfeld pushed his colleagues to focus on the long-range problem presented by the madrassas and by the need to continually push the government to innovate in the war that cannot be lost.

The second memo was authored by the staff to the Senate's Democrats sitting on the Senate Intelligence Committee. Its focus was on how to attack President Bush – how to manipulate the Committee's rules and its investigations so that both would serve partisan, short-term goals of wounding the president during an election year.

The Republican memo focused on defeating the country's enemies. The Democratic memo focused on defeating the Republicans.

In a nutshell, that is the crucial difference between the parties: The Republican Party priority is national security. The Democratic Party priority is Democratic Party power.

Democratic Sen. Zell Miller described the memo as a "first cousin to treason," and Republicans announced that the Senate Intelligence Committee's tradition of bipartisan work on behalf of the national security was dead.

Good. It is time for Senate Republicans to recognize that the Pat Leahys and the Jay Rockerfellers, the Barbara Boxers and the Carl Levins are not there to help the Republicans advance the national security interests of the United States. The refusal by Levin to denounce the memo on Sunday during his appearance with Tony Snow on Fox News Sunday was an opportunity to show himself as a genuine advocate for national defense by demanding an investigation into the staff who composed the hit plan on the president. Instead, Levin fumed on national television that the memo had been swiped.

Levin was more concerned with having his staff found out that with having his staff vetted for hyper-partisan hacks.

This is not treasonous behavior, just extremely selfish, churlish behavior – the sort associated with win-at-all-costs partisanship. The Democratic Party is so desperate to return to power that they have abandoned any sort of mooring to the traditional role of the loyal opposition during wartime. Indeed, it is difficult to escape the conclusion that the Democrats really don't believe it is a war.

So Howard Dean surges and Joe Lieberman fades. Al Gore appears from the shadows to denounce the Bush administration's drift toward Orwellian control, and Carl Levin contorts before a national audience. The serious people, including the president and the secretary of defense, go about their jobs defending the country and the gap between the parties grows wider every day.

I cannot believe the election of 2004 will be close. To vote for a Democrat after the past two-plus years is to vote for disarmament in the war on terrorism. They are a mediocre bunch, comfortable with playing D.C. games while enemies continue to bomb and kill.

How anyone can support them is baffling, and the evidence of their fecklessness overwhelming. We can only hope that between now and November of 2004 they remain consistent about their motives and outspoken about their beliefs.

What is really needed is a 60-seat majority for the GOP in the U.S. Senate. Visit the National Republican Senatorial Committee and send money. It is the best investment in the national security an ordinary citizen can make.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004memo; ccrm; dems; hughhewitt; memogate; presstitutes; rumsfeldmemo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Wednesday, November 12, 2003

Quote of the Day by Interesting Times

1 posted on 11/12/2003 2:32:41 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xm177e2; mercy; Wait4Truth; hole_n_one; GretchenEE; Clinton's a rapist; buffyt; ladyinred; Angel; ..

Hugh Hewitt MEGA PING!!


2 posted on 11/12/2003 2:33:59 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I cannot believe the election of 2004 will be close.

Is this your take, too John?

3 posted on 11/12/2003 2:38:58 AM PST by Aeronaut (In my humble opinion, the new expression for backing down from a fight should be called 'frenching')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aeronaut
Yep. Though we can't be complacent. We need to work like we're 10 points behind.
4 posted on 11/12/2003 2:41:30 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I have been waiting for someone to compare the latest memo leaks in an article and fianlly someone hit on it. One made the front page of the New York Times while the other was relegated to a blurb on page A14.
5 posted on 11/12/2003 2:42:59 AM PST by KC_Conspirator (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Though we can't be complacent. We need to work like we're 10 points behind.

Amen! I suppose you heard that twit Franken plans to run for Senate against Coleman in 5 years. That'll be a train wreck!

6 posted on 11/12/2003 2:44:17 AM PST by Aeronaut (In my humble opinion, the new expression for backing down from a fight should be called 'frenching')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
And yet the liberal media still maintains -- in the teeth of all the evidence -- there's no liberal media bias.
7 posted on 11/12/2003 2:44:23 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Aeronaut
That'll be a train wreck!

hehehe -- very true!

8 posted on 11/12/2003 2:44:55 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The Republican Party priority is national security. The Democratic Party priority is Democratic Party power.

Tag line material.

9 posted on 11/12/2003 2:50:25 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Brave Rifles! Veterans! You have been baptized in fire and blood and have come out steel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Bump!
10 posted on 11/12/2003 2:51:53 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Aeronaut; JohnHuang2
Maybe he'll bring all his Harvard helpers to aid him in his speech writing.
11 posted on 11/12/2003 2:58:56 AM PST by DeuceTraveler ((wedgie free for all))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I think a 60 seat majority in the Senate will just give the RINOS the power that the Crats have now.The rinos will join the remaining Crats to block conservative judges and legislation, especially repeals and rollbacks.
12 posted on 11/12/2003 3:00:01 AM PST by arthurus (When the other shoe drops, look out for the cleats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; *CCRM; *Presstitutes; yall
This is not treasonous behavior, just extremely selfish, churlish behavior – the sort associated with win-at-all-costs partisanship. The Democratic Party is so desperate to return to power that they have abandoned any sort of mooring to the traditional role of the loyal opposition during wartime. Indeed, it is difficult to escape the conclusion that the Democrats really don't believe it is a war.

I think it may be treason !!

Hey, John ! Question for you. I don't watch the Alphabet News (ABCNNBCBS, etc.), but I have heard that they have not mentioned the 'RAT MemoGate memo. True or not ??

And what about the major print media ? (LAT/WP, etc.) ...

Anyone ??


13 posted on 11/12/2003 3:02:01 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (Will work for tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I cannot believe the election of 2004 will be close. To vote for a Democrat after the past two-plus years is to vote for disarmament in the war on terrorism. They are a mediocre bunch, comfortable with playing D.C. games while enemies continue to bomb and kill.

BINGO!

Hugh nailed this one

14 posted on 11/12/2003 3:04:21 AM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
G'morning backatya, amigo

re: Alphabet News ... I haven't followed all of them, but I'd wager they haven't mentioned it; or if they have, only in passing.

re: LAT/WP ... The WP did a little write up. That's about it.

15 posted on 11/12/2003 3:04:31 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
I think a 60 seat majority in the Senate will just give the RINOS the power that the Crats have now.The rinos will join the remaining Crats to block conservative judges and legislation, especially repeals and rollbacks.

The Rinos best not be so complacent .. Because even though we will be shooting for a 60 seat Majority .. we will also be looking to replace those Rinos come primary time

Did ya hear that Specter

16 posted on 11/12/2003 3:08:59 AM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; *CCRM; *Presstitutes; yall
Man ! They sure gave enough coverage to the Rummy memo that was leaked. No bias here, nosiree !

Thanks ! ...


17 posted on 11/12/2003 3:25:20 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (Will work for tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
They sure gave enough coverage to the Rummy memo that was leaked.

And, to top it all, the Rummy memo was seized by the media as evidence -- DAMNING EVIDENCE -- we're losing the War on Terror. Go figure.

18 posted on 11/12/2003 3:30:15 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Zip; BOBWADE
ping
19 posted on 11/12/2003 3:30:44 AM PST by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Yep ! All he was doing was trying to get things churning to get ideas to better combat Terror ...

Take THAT, you biased bozos !! ...


Click HERE or on the pic to hear the Rolling Thunder !


20 posted on 11/12/2003 3:38:20 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (Will work for tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson