Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: runningbear
So far, it appears the hair is the only piece of evidence linking Laci Peterson to her husband's boat.

If that's all the hard evidence prosecutors have, even though Peterson may be guilty as sin it's doubtful he'll be convicted, it's not enough.

It looks like they're basing most of their case on circumstantial evidence like Peterson's affairs, but there will be a juror or two who will refuse to give someone the death penalty with only that to go by. My prediction: hung jury or possible conviction of manslaughter only.

20 posted on 11/13/2003 7:40:01 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Reaganwuzthebest
I'm still awaiting the info on the trip to the Marina which included saving the receipt and a phone call home. Scott broke his normal pattern.

He didn't usually go fishing (at least not with his own boat)???? He didn't make a second call to see if his very pregnant wife had perhaps gone to the hospital??? He didn't catch anything??? He washed his clothes right away??

So the jerk supplied ALL the evidence that he was so far away that he couldn't have possibly killed her...AND THE BODIES FLOAT TO SHORE.

Scott shouldn't be a mystery writer summarizes his "story".

22 posted on 11/13/2003 8:06:58 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Where do you get that? The Prosecution has a lot more evidence than the piece of hair!! They have tapes with Peterson absolutely incriminating himself with his OWN MOUTH.
40 posted on 11/13/2003 10:26:12 AM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson