[concerned about politics]

Why? Should a judge be able to act unlawfully as long as he's on "God's side"?

Our nations laws are based on God. Some have spun them to support Satan, but the founding fathers based them on God/ Biblical principles. Why should a man who follows the US laws based on God go against God? That would be a lie - a hypocracy - a blasphamy. Moore did what was right, and in tune with our forefathers intent.
The antiChrist followers put socialist PC first these days. It doesn't mean their lie is right. It just means the followers of antiChrist have been decieved by a lieing tounge.
When a God of Sodomy is placed in a public square, and the ten commandments outlawed, we see the truth of the new antiChrist agenda. In a socialist/communist society, morality is not allowed.

[Belial]

Moore did what was right, and in tune with our forefathers intent.

I see that you too wish to live in a theocracy. You want to believe that the Founding Fathers built our constitution to model the ethics of "God".

There are plenty of ways to refute this childish and prideful idea, but I doubt you'd understand what I'm talking about.

At least, understand this: judges aren't hired to divine the Founders' "intents". That opens the door to all kinds of subjectivity that a neutral judiciary is supposed to eliminate.

[WackyKat]

It obviously upsets you to no end that non-Christians are treated as equal citizens in this society.
Too bad for you

[Labyrinthos]

Some have spun them to support Satan, but the founding fathers based them on God/ Biblical principles.

Which is why the Founding Fathers specifically referenced God and those biblical principles in the Constitution. < /sarcasm >