To: sarasmom
The duo of Sarasmom and Santini keep hurling inventive, but avoid the topic - which is: Jonathan Pollard has been treated far more harshly than every other person in the U.S. who shared classified information, even though Jonathan shared the info with an ally and the rest shared with enemies bent on our destruction. Saracmom and Santini are thrilled that the Jew will rot. What about the rest of you?
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
Was he the consumate Jew?
What makes him different from the consumate Islamic?
Am I anti-semetic for calling for the ultimate punishment for the reprehensible crimes he was convicted of-because he was a "Jewish" traitor?
Do Jewish traitors get special allowances?
Or that he was nominally a Jew excuses him from punishment for violating his legal oathes of loyallty?
ZOT yourself.
As he did, when he turned traitor to his "sacred" oathes.
Oathes that are non-denominational, and binding.
.
29 posted on
11/25/2003 8:15:24 PM PST by
sarasmom
(Message to the DOD : Very good , troops.Carry on. IN MY NAME)
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
Jonathan Pollard has been treated far more harshly than every other person in the U.S. who shared classified information, Do you belive the Rosenbergs might dispute this?
36 posted on
11/25/2003 8:35:02 PM PST by
Colonel_Flagg
("This is the sort of English up with which I will not put." - Winston Churchill)
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
Your statement: "...Jonathan Pollard has been treated far more harshly than every other person in the U.S. who shared classified information..." is not factually true. Please refer to the Rosenburgs (sp?) and their dalliance with nuclear secrets and what became of them.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson