Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/14/2003 10:32:57 AM PST by 45Auto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 45Auto; *bang_list; Joe Brower
Bang!
2 posted on 11/14/2003 10:36:11 AM PST by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 45Auto
"At this time, it is obvious that all levels of government in the US view individual rights as things that exist only because government says so. Our government today has no interest in what "natural rights" are, or what people morally ought to be allowed to do for themselves. Those cities that have strict gun-control laws believe their low level of government has the right to abridge our most fundamental right of self-defense."

And therein lies the problem; if even the lowliest levels of government can so blithely ignore and infringe such a basic right as that of self defense, then in what kind of contempt do they hold liberty itself? Their attitude pits citizen against government at all levels under all circumstances. Is this not the definition of tyranny?

3 posted on 11/14/2003 10:40:07 AM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 45Auto

4 posted on 11/14/2003 10:40:24 AM PST by sourcery (No unauthorized parking allowed in sourcery's reserved space. Violators will be toad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 45Auto
Walter Williams said "if you are granted by your government the right to play hopscotch, that means you have no particular right to play jacks."

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Walter Williams is an idiot.
5 posted on 11/14/2003 10:47:47 AM PST by HEY4QDEMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 45Auto
Can I get an AMEN brothers and sisters? I know that's right.
6 posted on 11/14/2003 10:48:39 AM PST by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 45Auto
I agree that people have the right to move somewhere else if they don't like a particular place. Some people won't, some can't, but there are definately some that should.

If the amendments had not be written down, we would have had guns and free speech taken away a long time ago. How could we "prove" that we have the right to protect ourselves when liberals don't follow, or believe in?, natural law/rights. They would say the right to protect ourselves is done by having a military and police.
7 posted on 11/14/2003 10:52:34 AM PST by looscnnn ("Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils" Gen. John Stark 1809)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 45Auto
What is the rapist's worst nightmare? A woman with a gun.
17 posted on 11/14/2003 11:17:07 AM PST by Saundra Duffy (For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 45Auto
... and when California (or whoever) tells you to start registering weapons so they can come back in two years and confiscate them, the first thing to do is to go live somewhere else.

That is not a long-term solution. You can't run away forever. What happens if all 50 states became equally repressive? I can't think of any foreign country I want to live in. When I'm backed into a corner, you can damn well bet I will come out swinging.

29 posted on 11/14/2003 11:55:05 AM PST by TexasRepublic (Liberal = Socialist = Communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 45Auto
Look for the origin of the 2nd Amendment in England's Bill of Right in 1689.

That right is squarely founded in the right to resist and overthrow a tyrant.

Sovereignty ultimately resides in the people.

30 posted on 11/14/2003 12:20:42 PM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 45Auto
As he put it, if you are granted by your government the right to play hopscotch, that means you have no particular right to play jacks.

Here in Tennessee it was decided by the state supreme court that rubber ducky races were illegal; since then a referendum authorized a state lottery which has yet to start, but rubber ducky races are still held to be illegal by our AG.

40 posted on 11/17/2003 10:03:05 PM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson