When a judge issues an order, it is a directive from the bench for someone to do something. For example, if a judge orders someone to appear before the court on a certain date and time, that person is required to appear. If the person does not have a valid excuse for failing to do so, the person is in comtempt of the court's order. If one is in contempt of a state court order, the judge would be allowed to direct the sheriff to execute or enforce the order. If one is in contempt of a federal court order, the judge could direct the marshalls to enforce.
Not all opinions contain orders and most orders do not contain opinions, they're orders.
How can Judge Moore expect anyone appearing in his court to obey an order from his bench, when his whole attitude is that one should be given a pass on disobeying other judge's orders if one personally disagrees with him?