Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CASE CLOSED (Osama-Saddam Link Proved in Intel Cmte Brief)
Weekly Standard ^ | Nov 14, 2003 | Stephen Hayes

Posted on 11/14/2003 5:15:05 PM PST by RobFromGa

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 381-393 next last
To: sirchtruth
bump and a bookmark


321 posted on 11/15/2003 3:49:35 PM PST by prairiebreeze (Make it Happen, Louisiana! Elect Jindal as Governor!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
BUMP
322 posted on 11/15/2003 4:41:39 PM PST by KayEyeDoubleDee (const tag& constTagPassedByReference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monti Cello
Well, well documented!

The other person who seems to have had an operational relationship with Saddam in the 90's ... and the 80's ... and the 70's ... is Jacques Chirac.

It would be interesting if someone would check into whether or not Chirac knew that Saddam also had connections with Osama. Maybe, maybe not ... but worth finding out.

Dang!

Tilly
323 posted on 11/15/2003 4:43:56 PM PST by Tilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Not to worry. Pretty soon, the dems will start proclaiming that the memo was a fabrication. Or that the intel was faulty. OR ... someone had a political axe to grind, thus, it's not true.
(Pigs CAN fly, you know ... as evidenced by Hillary in Air Force One. Just ask any liberal ;)

Tilly
324 posted on 11/15/2003 4:47:31 PM PST by Tilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
"Or did you have something else in mind?"

There also remain several thousands of deaths, worldwide, Americans, innocents and otherwise, that will accrue from the ongoing prosecution of the War on Terror.

Most of them ultimately traceable to Clinton's incompetence and venality.

I am aware, of course, of the guidance and multiple warhead technology that was exchanged for campaign cash. I would also bet there are even more breaches of security and other manifestations of incompetence that we don't yet know about.

325 posted on 11/15/2003 5:11:25 PM PST by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa; hellinahandcart
I heard about this.
326 posted on 11/15/2003 5:38:35 PM PST by sauropod ("Better to keep your mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
Bump for later read.
327 posted on 11/15/2003 5:39:17 PM PST by Joe_October (Saddam supported Terrorists. Al Qaeda are Terrorists. I can't find the link.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I just did a quick headline search at CNN, NY Times, LA Times, etc. and (gee wiz) couldn't find any reference to this "leaked" memo.

I did a NewsAlert request on news.Google.com for "Saddam +Osama" to be emailed whenever those two appear in the same news article.

So far the only relevant newsalert article I've received has been for the WeeklyStandard.

328 posted on 11/15/2003 5:39:53 PM PST by auzerais (Stop C*ANSWER from Infecting America's Foreign Policy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Been on cable news alot today also
329 posted on 11/15/2003 5:42:25 PM PST by JustPiper (Illegals require a microchip, let's pitch in !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
Isn't the timing interesting? Makes me wonder if the memo from the Dem. staffer on the Intelligence committee was just put out there to suck up the oxygen in the media so that the memo outlining the cooperation between Sadaam and Osama would NOT be given media play, thus denying that info to the American public.
330 posted on 11/15/2003 5:50:33 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
bttt
331 posted on 11/15/2003 5:58:11 PM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
" MR. BEN-VENISTE: Now, the public record -- and I'll make reference to a June 22nd, 2003, newspaper article published by the Washington Post under the byline of Walter Pincus, who is one of the most respected journalists analyzing the intelligence community in our country, reported that there was significant doubt cast on this very al Qaeda-Iraqi connection."

Thanks for your post at #310 - the quote above is from the second link you provided which is the transcript of testimony given by Laurie Mylroie. Mr. Ben-Viniste's comments seemed to be intended to discredit Ms. Mylroie's testimony. Interesting that Mr. Walter Pincus, Washington Post, crops up again. (he seemed to be very familiar with the Wilson-Plame facts at a very early stage and apparently had dinner with the Wilsons on July 4)
332 posted on 11/15/2003 6:03:17 PM PST by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: moodyskeptic
"We've been hearing it for days now: Who leaked the secret Democrat documents?!"

Why, don't you know? The Republicans stole them.

That makes the GOP guilty of petty theft, while absolving the Democrats of sedition.

333 posted on 11/15/2003 6:13:57 PM PST by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: keri
ping
334 posted on 11/15/2003 6:30:20 PM PST by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
I haven't read it yet. I saw another(duplicate)post a few minutes ago. I'm going to read it as soon as I get through reading the other posts.Thanks.Looks really interesting.And just think, Rush is back Monday! I'm sure Hannity will cover it too.
335 posted on 11/15/2003 6:46:36 PM PST by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: blackie
Thanks,blackie!
336 posted on 11/15/2003 7:02:23 PM PST by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
Bookmarked for future reference.Thanks very much
337 posted on 11/15/2003 7:05:53 PM PST by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Steve; deport; Salvation
Did you see this?
338 posted on 11/15/2003 7:06:32 PM PST by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; dighton; Chancellor Palpatine; Southack; PeoplesRep_of_LA; mhking; Miss Marple; ...
Take a look, folks.

Looks like all the cause for war we need, if you ask me.
339 posted on 11/15/2003 7:34:14 PM PST by hchutch ("I don't see what the big deal is, I really don't." - Major Vic Deakins, USAF (ret.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
The way I see it is this: I already figured there was a link between Osama and Iraq. I mean, they had common enemies after Gulf War I: The U.S. and Saudi Arabia. And the U.S. IN Saudi Arabia. It makes perfect sense that Saddam and Osama both would be helping out the enemy of his enemy on the sly.


But don't think this will change any skeptic's minds. They'll just say it was made up.
340 posted on 11/15/2003 7:41:15 PM PST by wimpycat ("I'm mean, but I make up for it by bein' real healthy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 381-393 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson