[First Amendment]

(I didn't link to the whole article on Iconoclast so I missed some of it) but here is my take:

The focus on the "children" is SOLELY AND WHOLELY because the leftists desire an entire generation under their thrall. How to get an entire generation zombie-fied when some parents won't contribute to the zombie-fication? GET RID OF THE INFLUENCE OF INDIVIDUAL FAMILIES! That's why they hate homeschooling - note the recent SeeBS two part slam on homeschooling - I didn't see it (don't own a Teev) but read about it here, and it was obviously a vicious bunch of lies intended to villify homeschoolers as subhuman child killers.

Remember pictures of Soviet era child nurseries? Rows of little kiddies all with the same bows, all sitting on the potty at once, etc? Everyone should re-read "Brave New World" and the group nurseries there - that is an allegory for what the left wants to do. (Exaggerated of course, but the truth is the truth.) The left is doing everything it can to take away family integrity (changing the meaning of marriage for one) - no fault divorce, intrusive questionaires at schools, various kinds of indoctrination at schools, removing parental rights such as laws allowing 12 yr old girls to get abortions without parents' knowledge or consent, etc.

When leftists say "it's for the children" they mean they want an entire generation of mind-numbed robots voting for them, and not protesting if they attempt more sinister methods of control.

[philman_36]

When leftists say "it's for the children" they mean they want an entire generation of mind-numbed robots voting for them, and not protesting if they attempt more sinister methods of control.
And what is it when "rightists" do it? Same thing, same desired outcome? And if you say they don't do it I, for one, can show you that they do indeed do the "it's for the children" routine too.
Isn't it all really left with no actual right?