Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The trail of tears continues for Black Indians
Final Call ^ | Nov 10, 2003 | Saeed Shabazz

Posted on 11/17/2003 4:57:33 PM PST by SJackson


The Finley Family, (l-r) JaVonte Molette, his mother Karissa Molette, her grandmother Barbara Finley, Robert Finley and Angela Molette. Photos: Saeed Shabazz

ENID, Oklahoma (FinalCall.com) - "History speaks of the ‘Trail of Tears’ in the past tense, and perhaps for the Indian nations it is, but for Black Indians 173 years later, we find ourselves still traveling this journey," Eleanor "Gypsy" Wyatt, chairman of the Freedman Descendents of the Five Civilized Tribes told those gathered at the first annual Enid, Oklahoma, Black Indian pow wow.

She was speaking of the forced march at gunpoint that thousands of Native Americans endured in the 1930s after the United States government decided that they wanted the Indian lands east of the Mississippi.

Ms. Wyatt said her ancestors marched on the trail, and like many Black families, part of their history has been lost. "Though my complexion is of a dark hue, my African brothers don’t claim me for my hair is too straight or wavy, my nose is not broad, my lips are not full. My Choctaw and Chickasaw brothers won’t claim me, although my features are much like their own. I am a reminder of the inhumane treatment against a people," she said.

In 1929, settlers found gold on the Cherokee lands in northeastern Georgia, and they wanted government officials to remove the Indians off their land. In 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act, which was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson. The act argued that, "no state could achieve proper culture, civilization, and progress, as long as Indians remained within its boundaries." The bill called for the removal of all Indians in the southeastern United States to the territory west of the Mississippi River. In 1838, the first groups started out on their 1,000-mile trek, which became known as the Trail of Tears because of the horrors faced, such as disease, lack of food, water and bad weather.

Indian nations such as the Cherokee, Choctaw, Creek, Kickapoo, Seminole, Wyandotte, Lenapi, Chickasaw and Mohawk had their lands taken away because settlers and corporations wanted more land, according to historians.

The Cherokee arrived on March 24, 1839 in their new land called the Indian Territory, now Oklahoma, a word that means "red people."

Today, organizations, such as the Black Indians United Legal Defense and Education Fund and the Freedman Descendants of the Five Civilized Tribes, argue that the history of Black Indians has been left out deliberately by government agencies such as the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA).

"Our current struggles arise from what seems to be a concerted effort by the highest levels of U.S. government agencies responsible for the fiduciary and trustee duties to deny Black Indians their rights under the Treaty of 1866, giving slaves held by the five tribes equal rights, as full members of the tribes.

"I charge the BIA with ethnic cleansing, racial discrimination, ethnically exclusionary procedural systems and breach of contractual obligations," Ms. Molette said. She said the main purpose of the First Annual Black Indian Pow Wow in Enid was to call "members" of the five tribes back home so that they may re-claim the heritage that was lost due to the forced exile. Historians have estimated that at least 18 percent of the Indians that survived the Trail of Tears were Black.

Robert Finley, 62, told The Final Call that he moved back to Enid from California to claim his lost heritage. He said his father Robert Finley, Sr., would sit around the house on the weekends and hold conversations with his uncles in Choctaw. "I would ask them what language they were speaking, and they would tell me that I would pick it up as I got older, but that never happened," Mr. Finley said. He said that his generation was not encouraged to seek information about their Indian heritage. He said the elders felt it was difficult enough being Black, and adding the Indian to it would make life unbearable.


Pearl Mitchell

Pearl Mitchell, 86, is the matriarch in Enid’s Black Indian enclave. "We never knew much about our Indian heritage," she said, admitting that she learned more about her true heritage at the pow wow than she had over the years. "It is good that the young want to know about their Indian ancestors," Ms. Mitchell added.

James Hakeem Sweeney, his sister Nzingha Beverly Sweeney and Charline Habiba Tramel traveled from Buffalo, New York, to attend the pow wow. "There is a part of my history here that I need to know," Mr. Sweeney said. He said his grandparents came from Oklahoma. Nzingha Sweeney said that she always felt that her grandparents, aunts and uncles were keeping secrets about their Indian heritage. "I remember looking at my grandfather with those cheekbones and high nose, and I would say there is more to where we come from," Ms. Sweeney shared.

"I have been to other pow wows because I am always searching for my Indian history. I have grandchildren and I want them to know where they come from, so they will know where they are going," Ms. Tramel said.

(If you are interested in gaining knowledge of genealogy techniques and family contacts, you may contact Angela Molette at the Southern Heights Heritage Center and Museum, 616 Leona Mitchell Boulevard, Enid, Oklahoma 73701, or call (580) 237-6989.)


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: americanindians
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
Interesting article, and yes I know the source.

I'd be curious to hear informed comments re Historians have estimated that at least 18 percent of the Indians that survived the Trail of Tears were Black

The concept, which Saeed seems to be raising, of two classes of Native Americans, Black Native Americans, and plain seems to be a throwback to the 1% black, you're black concept.

1 posted on 11/17/2003 4:57:34 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mhking
ping
2 posted on 11/17/2003 4:57:59 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The Chickasaws and other Civilized Tribes had some fairly wealthy members who had slaves. The slaves were given Roll numbers as if they were members of the tribe and are entitled to all benefits due tribe members. The Indians did and do make a distinction socially.
3 posted on 11/17/2003 5:07:25 PM PST by metalcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metalcor
I was thinking intermarriage, but that makes sense.
4 posted on 11/17/2003 5:11:12 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Not a surprise. I've got a cousin who has traced my Cherokee & Chocktaw background on my paternal grandfather's side of the family all the way back to Chief Tuskaloosa nearly 500 years ago.

On my paternal grandfather's side, there's ties to Chocktaw and other tribes in the lower part of Louisiana.

From what I understand, I may have more Indian in me than black when you measure it all out.

I'm still doing a lot of looking - of course it's rather difficult, at best, to find black and Indian heritage info. I've been able to trace English and Scottish roots back to the UK (Wilkinson, Stark & Biddle), and have found that my family includes a number of historical figures in American history.

There's a lot of info out there to be had, once you start looking.

Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

5 posted on 11/17/2003 5:16:10 PM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Oh geez... Now the "Black Indians" need to have their own Black Pow-wows, and organizations and stuff? I guess they don't want to be associated with us "Red People", except in name, huh?

Racists.
6 posted on 11/17/2003 5:29:06 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (Visit http://www.intelmemo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I think that number is somewhat inflated... I recall mentions of "hundreds" of blacks on the trail of tears, but not that high of a percentage. Maybe I'm wrong, though... I know the Seminole adopted some black runaway slaves over time, but they would have more than likely been assimilated into the tribes eventually...

7 posted on 11/17/2003 5:32:08 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (Visit http://www.intelmemo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; stand watie
She was speaking of the forced march at gunpoint that thousands of Native Americans endured in the 1930s

In 1929, settlers found gold on the Cherokee lands in northeastern Georgia, and they wanted government officials to remove the Indians off their land.

1930's, 1830's, what's a century here or there?

I would also like to know what kind of "Native American" name is Saeed or Hakim.

The Cherokee, Choctaw and Chickasaw nations were assimilated to the point that they owned large plantations in Georgia and Alabama. They owned Black slaves. This is the origin of "Black Native Americans." When they were exiled to Oklahoma, they took their slaves with them.

Many escaped slaves were accepted as members of the Seminole nation.

8 posted on 11/17/2003 5:37:50 PM PST by Alouette (My son, the Learned Elder of Zion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks; metalcor
It struck me as high, but metalcors reference to the slave issue is interesting, though I can't imagine they were allowed to take slaves along.
9 posted on 11/17/2003 5:39:09 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I didn't know there was a TRAIL OF TEARS in the 1930's.
10 posted on 11/17/2003 5:41:15 PM PST by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
I noticed she(?) said In 1929, settlers found gold on the Cherokee lands in northeastern Georgia..., given the source it never occured to me actually she meant 1929, cats on the keyboard.

I would also like to know what kind of "Native American" name is Saeed or Hakim.

The kind that doesn't get to open a casino, yet.

11 posted on 11/17/2003 5:42:39 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mhking; All
Interesting. I myself am adopted so I can not trace my lineage with any accuracy. I am most asuuredly non-indian though. I know I could find out my lineage if I tried hard enough but for some reason I think that would be disrespectful as I consider my parents, my "true" parents. I know it is not logical but there you have it.

I would like to direct all of your attention to www.badeagle.com as I think it's a great website.

12 posted on 11/17/2003 5:43:02 PM PST by Arioch7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
In all actually, from what I understand, not only were they allowed to take slaves along, the slaves were put on the Indian Rolls and received all the "benefits" of tribal memberships...

13 posted on 11/17/2003 5:48:44 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (Visit http://www.intelmemo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
the slaves were put on the Indian Rolls and received all the "benefits" of tribal memberships...

As with many Indian questions, this one is being fought out in Oklahoma today, just as if it were still 1822. There's money and power at stake, of course, including the all-important casino, smoke shop, and license plate issues, as well as the disbursement of Federal funds.

I recall from earlier this year (before we moved from the Creek Nation :-), that the Seminoles have the biggest fight right now, over who gets to vote in tribal elections. While most Eastern tribes owned slaves and practiced intermarriage to an extent before the removal, the Seminoles, because they were located outside the borders of the United States for a long period, admitted a large number of escaped slaves as full members of the tribe. This has been a political problem on and off, when disputes on various issues have divided along "mostly-Indian" vs. "mostly-Black" lines. The recent conflict involved a "Seminole-blood" faction trying to have the descendants of slaves excluded from voting, because they supported a different candidate.

There are some very interesting stories in the WPA "Oklahoma Slave Narratives," the collection of the oral histories of former slaves recorded during the Depression. The interaction of the tribes/tribal factions with the issues of the post-Civil War period is quite fascinating. Try your library!

14 posted on 11/17/2003 6:07:50 PM PST by Tax-chick (Where am I? Who are all these kids, and why are they calling me Mom?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: everyone
Personally, I deeply believe that I'm one of the few White, Native-Americans who were both black AND Polish.
But the fact that I'm left-handed separates me from my metrosexual brothers who won't accept me because of my German-American wife, and our children who have watered-down French and Irish lineage from my mother's side of the family.
Ours is a sad story that is seldom told...
Please, don't ask me about my dog...
15 posted on 11/17/2003 6:07:56 PM PST by baltodog (I'm Polish. I'm left-handed. I'm a drummer. I demand reparations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: baltodog
I hope your not red-headed as well. That would be more than the average man could bear.
16 posted on 11/17/2003 6:15:42 PM PST by Adrastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Did American Indians keep slaves? This is new to me -- I need to learn more.
17 posted on 11/17/2003 6:28:30 PM PST by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ellery
Some members of some tribes did, yes...
18 posted on 11/17/2003 6:30:18 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (Visit http://www.intelmemo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ellery
Did American Indians keep slaves?

The American Indians are a fascinating study. They had a lot of good attributes, but we mustn't forget that they were human beings and indulged in all the human vices as well.

19 posted on 11/17/2003 6:41:29 PM PST by Agnes Heep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
Didn't mean to imply that "American Indians" represents some homogeneous group. :) I just didn't realize *any* members of *any* tribe did. I also didn't know that Black Indians was a descriptive term -- I thought it was the name of a tribe.
20 posted on 11/17/2003 6:42:22 PM PST by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson