Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oopimrehs
Man, you parroted every single pro-gay talking point there is! Please permit me to demolish all of them, one by one:

Gays are not going to go away.

That's just a polite re-phrasing of "We're here, we're queer, we're in your face!" First of all, the "gay" activists have lied for years that "they" are 10%, when they knew dam' well that figure was a lie invented by the pervert Kinsey for propoganda purposes. The real number is something like 1.5% to 2.5%, although more young people are inspired by media and school sex ed to "try" anything. Homosexuals used to be in the closet, ashamed of what they did, and often tried - sometimes with success! to over come such inclinations.

What's wrong with giving them privileges that will allow them to be functioning members of society just like everyone else?

There's nothing preventing someone with same-sex desires from being a functioning member of society right now. They have ADMITTED, darling, that they don't want marriage per se, what their STATED goal is, is this: they want to change the moral atmosphere of society from a family man/woman oriented one to "anything goes" - which means, transgendered, bisexual, gay, lesbian, etc etc. They don't want marriage, they want to destroy marriage by re-defining it.

. Just ordinary young professionals, not your crazy Gay Pride types.

You must be a shill for the "gay" agenda - your statements are so full of nonsense. Just because a homosexual person goes to work and looks normal has nothing to do with whether they go to a "Gay Pride" parade dressed up like a nun on a float humping other "nuns" in leather thongs! You mean to say that you personally know all the gay residents around, and you know for a fact that they all lead buttoned-down lives after work???

You have to be nuts to think that, for all the ill spoken of gay people, that someone would CHOOSE to be gay and deal with all the crap they get.

Another talking point - you trot out all of them! You've got a good memory. There was an article the other day here on FR by Michael Signorile (or however it's spelled) where he (one of the most outrageous "gay" activists there are) directly stated that many people who are otherwise straight are starting to "experiment" with "gay" sex because it's easy to find anonymous sex partners on the internet. Many "gay" people themselves admit they chose to be "gay".

Frankly, I sometimes think the biggest homophobes are people who are secretly gay themselves, and think they can contain it by being super anti gay.

Ah, you saved the best for (almost) the last! What an old, discredited chestnut - the only purpose "gay" activists use this lie is to shut up any opposition to their arguments. "If you disagree with me, you must BE one!"

To carry this argument further, those who want to take everyone's gun away secretly want to have a gun themselves?

Besides, it's a bit hypocritical to complain that they live licentious lives and then deny them civil union privileges that would help correct such defects.

Since the average male homosexual "coupling" lasts about 1.5 years, and even monogamy with them generally includes an understanding that outside sex is ok, why will a law change that? The average homosexual has a HUGE number of partners - many solely for sex, anonymous even - how will some law change that? Most homosexuals do not want to get "married" - it would cramp their style.

170 posted on 11/18/2003 8:02:52 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah
Since the average male homosexual "coupling" lasts about 1.5 years, and even monogamy with them generally includes an understanding that outside sex is ok, why will a law change that? The average homosexual has a HUGE number of partners - many solely for sex, anonymous even - how will some law change that? Most homosexuals do not want to get "married" - it would cramp their style.

i thought it was funny how you accused the other poster of "parroting" pro-gay "talking points" and then summed up your post by spewing this list of oft repeated but factually suspect anti-gay talking points.

546 posted on 11/19/2003 2:13:16 AM PST by jethropalerobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah
I also read a study that stated that children of queers tend to be more sexually active and more into drugs than children of non queers, and in countries like Holland, queers that are "married" still have almost 100 "partners" a year. It's a total sham.
551 posted on 11/19/2003 9:08:21 AM PST by richtig_faust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson